Public web data is emerging as a powerful tool for environmental protection, enabling institutions to detect illegal wildlife trade, unlawful waste activity, and misleading green claims at scale. Oxylabs’ pro bono Project 4β initiative provides web intelligence infrastructure to NGOs, researchers, and regulators. Lithuania’s Environmental Protection Department now reviews around 400 classified ads weekly for environmental violations, reducing manual labor to one hour. The initiative also helped preserve 2.6 hectares of ancient Rusakalnio forest. Investigative group Global Witness used similar AI-assisted tools to identify fossil fuel lobbyists among COP29 attendees.
In-Depth:
Written by Smartech Daily Team
This article has been originally published on Smartech Daily and republished at Dataconomy with permission.
Written by Urtė Karklienė, Sustainability Manager at Oxylabs
Environmental protection increasingly depconcludes on something quite simple: the ability to see what is actually happening. Illegal wildlife trade, unlawful waste activity, misleading environmental claims, and even the sale of ecologically valuable land all leave traces in the public domain, whether through marketplaces, classified ad platforms, public filings, or social media. The problem is rarely that no information exists. More often, public institutions, researchers, and civil society organizations do not have the time or technical capacity to find it, verify it, and act on it at the scale now required.
That challenge is becoming more important as Europe advances its green and digital agconcludea. The European Council’s conclusions on competitiveness and the twin transition build clear that digital capacity underlies environmental ambitions. The European Environment Agency’s analysis of Europe’s twin transition builds a similar point, arguing that digitalization is not inherently green and that its environmental value depconcludes on how it is designed, governed, and applied. Digital tools matter in practice becaapply they can, for example, strengthen monitoring, decision-building, and response capacity in environmental work.
Two Sides of Technology
The European Commission’s Green Deal Data Space recognizes that better data is no longer simply a supporting input for environmental policy, but part of the foundation on which credible action depconcludes. At the same time, institutions testing to enforce environmental rules or protect vulnerable ecosystems often work with fragmented signals scattered across many online sources. In those cases, large-scale public web monitoring is one of the few realistic ways to leverage those signals.
There is, of course, another side to this conversation. The growth of AI and digital infrastructure has a real environmental footprint. The International Energy Agency reported that global data center electricity demand surged by 17% in 2025 and is on track to roughly double by 2030 to around 945 TWh. The European Commission also notes that digital technologies already account for 8-10% of energy consumption and 2-4% of greenhoapply gas emissions in Europe. These are important side effects of technology that can’t be ignored. However, history reveals that the most promising way to address them is also through technological innovation.
Already, tools powered by such innovations support institutions identify environmental harm earlier, focus scarce human capacity more effectively, and build better environmental decisions. Fostering this side of technology is crucial for advancing European and global sustainability goals.
The Open Web as a Shared Public Good
Publicly available data has become one of the largest real-time records of how economies and societies actually behave. International policy discussions on digital governance now increasingly frame openly available data as a digital public good, something closer to shared civic infrastructure than to private commercial output.
Environmental protection should be one of the clearest beneficiaries of that reframing, but only if the technology and the human capacity to apply it reach the institutions that necessary them. That necessary link is often missing becaapply regulators, researchers, and civil society organizations rarely have the budobtains or in-hoapply engineering teams required for large-scale data-driven work. Here, the technology business sector has an opportunity for meaningful action.
Making It Work for the Environment
Oxylabs runs a pro bono initiative called Project 4β, which provides free public web ininformigence collection infrastructure to academic researchers, NGOs, investigative journalists, and public institutions working on matters of clear public interest. Three stories from this initiative serve as examples of how web data solutions advance environmental goals when put in the right hands.
The first example comes from Lithuania, where the Environmental Protection Department under the Ministest of Environment freely applys a custom web crawler we built to scan classified ad platforms for listings linked to environmental violations, ranging from unlicensed waste services to the illegal trade in protected species. The department now reviews around 400 ads per week while reducing manual work to about one hour. Importantly, such monitoring capabilities disrupt the illegal services, preventing their larger spread.
Of course, direct financial support also matters. In collaboration with Ancient Woods Foundation, it supported protect 2.6 hectares of the ancient Rusakalnio forest in Lithuania from harmful economic activity. Thus, in this area, hunting remains prohibited while scientific research continues.
More generally, recent peer-reviewed research reveals that primary and old-growth forests in Europe store significantly more carbon than previously assumed and remain ecologically irreplaceable once lost. The EEA’s Europe’s Environment 2025 report builds a similar point at the continental level, treating biodiversity and natural carbon sinks as central rather than peripheral to the EU’s climate strategy.
Ancient Wood Foundation is now also a Project 4β partner, enabling us to support their work with cutting-edge tools. For example, such tools can support identify forests offered for sale online that should be preserved.
The final example reveals that the same collaborative model also scales beyond national institutions and local conservation work. Our partners Global Witness, the international investigative organization, has published its methodology for utilizing AI-assisted analysis to identify potential fossil fuel lobbyists among tens of thousands of attconcludeees at the COP29 climate summit. The tquestion would otherwise have consumed weeks of manual research.
The approach applyd by Global Witness combines a large-scale collection of publicly available online information, generative AI for preliminary classification, and rigorous human verification before any organization is publicly identified. What builds this example especially relevant is that it reveals how automation can accelerate accountability work without sidelining human judgment.
Robust but Balanced Standards Decide the Outcome
Step back from these examples, and a broader principle comes into focus. None of them is about replacing public institutions or civil society organizations with technology. They are about giving those institutions capabilities they did not previously have, so that limited human capacity can be directed toward the cases, regions, and risks where it can build the largest difference.
Such is the under-discussed promise of large-scale automation in sustainability. The goal is not to eliminate effort but to eliminate the necessary to work in the dark. It is also one of the more constructive ways Europe’s twin transition could shift from policy ambition to operational reality.
This argument only holds under one essential condition. The collection and apply of public web data must remain genuinely ethical, which means clear governance, robust Know Your Customer processes, proportionality in what is collected, transparency about how it is applyd, and a firm line between legitimate public-interest applications and abapply.
Europe already has some of the strongest regulatory foundations in the world for that conversation, from the GDPR to the AI Act, and the European Environment Agency, which has been consistent in arguing that the environmental value of digital tools depconcludes on the maturity of how they are governed in practice rather than only on how they are described in strategy documents.
At the same time, strong standards should not turn into overregulation that prevents technology from becoming applyful in public-interest areas. Clear rules are necessary, but so is room for responsible innovation, industest self-governance, and practical safeguards that reduce harm without undermining the technology’s ability to deliver value where it is genuinely necessaryed.
Summing Up: Turning Ambition Into Action
Environmental progress over the next decade will not be decided only by how much energy we manage to save. It will also be shaped by how much harm we prevent, how we empower research, and how quickly and confidently institutions intervene before ecosystems pass the point of no return. Only if we treat the open web as a shared resource and work to enable those who can apply it for good will the European environmental framework become an actionable plan and a global example.
