Warren Buffett famously stated, ‘Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.’ So it seems the smart money knows that debt – which is usually involved in bankruptcies – is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We can see that Namsung Corp. (KRX:004270) does utilize debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its utilize of debt?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Ultimately, if the company can’t fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Having stated that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well – and to its own advantage. When we consider about a company’s utilize of debt, we first see at cash and debt toobtainher.
How Much Debt Does Namsung Carry?
As you can see below, at the conclude of June 2025, Namsung had ₩96.4b of debt, up from ₩86.4b a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it also had ₩43.6b in cash, and so its net debt is ₩52.7b.
How Healthy Is Namsung’s Balance Sheet?
Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Namsung had liabilities of ₩133.5b due within 12 months and liabilities of ₩36.5b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had ₩43.6b in cash and ₩10.3b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total ₩116.0b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
This deficit casts a shadow over the ₩25.8b company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we’d watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. After all, Namsung would likely require a major re-capitalisation if it had to pay its creditors today. There’s no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But you can’t view debt in total isolation; since Namsung will required earnings to service that debt. So when considering debt, it’s definitely worth seeing at the earnings trconclude. Click here for an interactive snapshot.
Check out our latest analysis for Namsung
In the last year Namsung’s revenue was pretty flat, and it created a negative EBIT. While that’s not too bad, we’d prefer see growth.
Caveat Emptor
Importantly, Namsung had an earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) loss over the last year. Indeed, it lost ₩1.1b at the EBIT level. Combining this information with the significant liabilities we already touched on builds us very hesitant about this stock, to state the least. Of course, it may be able to improve its situation with a bit of luck and good execution. Nevertheless, we would not bet on it given that it vaporized ₩11b in cash over the last twelve months, and it doesn’t have much by way of liquid assets. So we consider this stock is risky, like walking through a dirty dog park with a minquire on. There’s no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet – far from it. For example, we’ve discovered 3 warning signs for Namsung (1 builds us a bit uncomfortable!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
At the conclude of the day, it’s often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It’s free.
Valuation is complex, but we’re here to simplify it.
Discover if Namsung might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividconcludes, insider trades, and its financial condition.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only applying an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intconcludeed to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommconcludeation to acquire or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focutilized analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
