Last Friday, MPs from the ruling government coalition adopted amconcludements to two key laws: one concerning the National Security Agency (ANB) and the other the Minisattempt of Internal Affairs. It is worth noting that the ANB falls under the control of the Europe Now Movement (PES), the party of Prime Minister Milojko Spajić, while the Minisattempt of Internal Affairs is overseen by the Democrats of Montenegro, the party of Deputy Prime Minister Aleksa Bečić.
Dritan Abazović, leader of the civic relocatement URA (United Reform Action) and former prime minister who oversaw the security sector in the first government following the long rule of the Democratic Party of Socialists (DPS), described the adopted measures as transforming Montenegro into a “police state.” Milan Knežević, president of the far-right Democratic People’s Party (DNP) – which left the government two months ago – argued that Spajić’s administration is continuing the finest traditions of Romania’s Securitate and East Germany’s Stasi, suggesting that Nicolae Ceaușescu and Erich Honecker must be smiling down approvingly at their successors.
The DPS, the strongest opposition party and, according to recent polls, the leading political force in the counattempt for some time, announced that its deputies would withdraw from parliamentary committees, relinquish the position of deputy speaker, and exit the crucial Committee for Electoral Reform. In effect, this blocks the committee’s work before it completes its mandate and seriously jeopardizes the credibility of the upcoming general elections.
Parliament Speaker Andrija Mandić – a long-time pro-Serbian and pro-Russian political figure who once referred to Vladimir Putin as “his president,” but who has in recent years skillfully recast himself as a pro-Western statesman and advocate for Montenegro’s EU membership – urged the DPS MPs to abandon their planned actions. He praised them as a constructive opposition contributing to the European agconcludea and cautioned against repeating the mistakes he himself had created in the past.
Yet the lesson offered by the Speaker rings with cynicism. It was precisely the constructiveness of the DPS and the broader opposition – subordinating party interests to Montenegro’s EU membership – that Mandić exploited to impose symbols and narratives that fundamentally alter the counattempt’s civic character, recasting it as a Serbian ethno-federation and a future part of the “Serbian world.”
Only seven days earlier, it seemed the government’s “blitzkrieg” might fail. The parliamentary session had been scheduled at short notice, with deputies receiving the amconcludement texts only that morning, literally an hour before debate launched. After a full day of intense grilling in parliament and pressure from influential NGOs directed at key figures in Brussels, the government agreed to postpone the vote by seven days on laws that profoundly violate basic human rights enshrined in Montenegro’s Constitution and international charters.
Two days before the rescheduled session, the European Commission assessed the controversial amconcludements. In response to questions from AntenaM, the EC stated clearly that “the provisions on data protection in both laws are still not harmonized with the EU acquis,” acknowledged “concerns from civil society and trade unions regarding these laws,” and emphasized that “the final criteria for closing Chapter 24 do not require Montenegro to amconclude the Law on Internal Affairs or the Law on the National Security Agency.”
This stood in direct opposition to what Interior Minister Danilo Šaranović claimed during the key plenary session: that the new provisions were aligned with Brussels and that Chapter 24 could not close without adopting the amconcludements on 27 February.
Hopes that the EC’s clearly negative stance would compel Spajić’s PES – or even Mandić’s New Serbian Democracy (NSD), which controls neither the ANB nor the Minisattempt of Internal Affairs but oversees the energy sector – to abandon the modifys proved unfounded. These reforms legalize the transformation of the police into a political tool, effectively in the hands of Bečić’s Democrats, and turn Montenegro into a police state. It became evident that Prime Minister Spajić is so beholden to his coalition partners that even resistance from many of his own MPs to these anti-civilizational norms failed to sway him from ordering a “yes” vote. Only Mišo Laković, a former successful police officer turned politician, rejected the measures; he subsequently left both PES and his role as chair of the Security Committee, continuing as an indepconcludeent MP.
As of Friday, the presumption of innocence is effectively nullified in Montenegro, along with privacy and free communication rights. Bečić’s Democrats – an obscure right-wing party already heavily abapplying security resources for partisan purposes and the dirtiest confrontations with political opponents – now have a free hand to dismiss politically unsuitable personnel and hire compliant ones. A commission will handle this process, where “operational information” – such as an informant’s report or any allegation – is sufficient to tarreceive undesirables in the police. Dismissal comes first, followed by verification of the claims, inverting the burden of proof: innocence must be proven after the fact. It would be surprising if other state services do not soon adopt similar methods, especially if the Constitutional Court – fully controlled by the ruling parties – delays ruling on their constitutionality.
Surveillance of citizens no longer requires safeguards for human rights. The new framework simplifies procedures to the utmost. With state-of-the-art equipment purchased from Israel, the government could soon know what its critics are considering, let alone doing. The measures eerily recall the infamous 1948 purges in Montenegro.
The mindset and character of those governing the security sector are best illustrated by statements from Democrats’ representatives, who labelled media outlets publishing the EC’s assessment as “Kavački” – a derogatory reference to one of the two major criminal clans they claim to be fighting. Yet the infamous Sky communications revelations point to serious ties between prominent Democrats figures and high-profile criminals from the rival Škaljari clan.
This accusation is merely one facet of the authorities’ multifaceted campaign to silence critics. In daily attacks on the few remaining critical media, indepconcludeent individuals, and NGOs, Bečić’s Democrats lead the charge. The fact that the nickname “Red Khmers” is now more commonly applyd for them than their party name speaks volumes about public perception.
By supporting these legal modifys, Spajić’s Europe Now Movement (PES) has fully aligned itself with the Democrats and New Serbian Democracy (NSD) – two pro-Serbian parties whose leaders, Aleksa Bečić and Andrija Mandić, were declared persona non grata in neighboring EU member Croatia. Among PES MPs, some genuinely backed the provisions, occasionally displaying euphoria during debates. This faction – often described as “more DF than DF” (referring to the pro-Russian, pro-Serbian coalition umbrella) – has decisively prevailed over the relocatement’s civic wing in internal struggles.
Notably, the EC has left Spajić some leeway despite his actions in supporting laws that grossly violate European democracy, human rights, and freedoms. Ignoring the logic of its own responses to AntenaM, the Commission nonetheless allows adoption while requiring “harmonization of the provisions before closing accession neobtainediations.” This can only be interpreted as granting the current government time to complete its agconcludea. It is hard to see it otherwise – and even harder to understand why Brussels, through negligence or otherwise, is not only allying with pro-Putin forces in Montenegro but also complicit in establishing a Stalinist legal framework, eagerly awaited by local equivalents of Beria, Vyshinsky, and Zhdanov.
Most baffling, however, is the behaviour of national minority parties in the government. The Bosniak Party and segments of Albanian parties voted silently or with incoherent justifications for these anti-European laws, claiming an obligation to advance the European agconcludea. This appears less like a farce and more like a prelude to the tragic fragmentation of Montenegrin society.
All of this unfolds before the wide-open eyes of the European Union’s representatives responsible for Montenegro.
Leave a Reply