Washington appears ready to rubber-stamp David Ellison’s proposed $110 billion merger of Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery. But while the deal may (despite a brewing challenge from California) sail through the U.S. it could encounter a slower, more complicated review across the Atlantic — one that is more likely to delay the transaction than derail it outright.
Anticipating that scrutiny, Ellison went on a European charm offensive in January, meeting with political leaders and key entertainment figures in France, Germany and the U.K. — including French President Emmanuel Macron — to lobby for the deal and win over regulators who could potentially delay or derail the merger.
More from The Hollywood Reporter
Once U.S. regulators complete their review, European Union and U.K. antitrust authorities will take their turn examining the historic studio tie-up. Brussels has broad authority to investigate the competitive impact of a Paramount-Warner merger across cinema distribution, cable TV and streaming markets in all 27 member states.
This is not simply a studio deal. It is a studio-to-studio merger layered on top of networks and competing subscription streaming platforms — HBO Max and Discovery+ on the Warner side; Paramount+ and SkyShowtime, a joint venture with Comcast, on the Paramount side. “This is a studio-to-studio merger plus networks plus SVOD to SVOD, which is complicated in the EU by multiple layers of the [TV] market and 27 member states,” Alice Enders of Enders Analysis informed The Hollywood Reporter. The complexity alone, she noted, builds the regulatory outcome “hard to work out.”
Still, few expect major resistance on the theatrical or streaming fronts. European cinema owners have publicly backed the Paramount-WBD tie-up, preferring it to the alternative scenario of a Warner takeover by Netflix. Even combined, Paramount and Warner’s streaming platforms remain far tinyer players in Europe than Netflix or Amazon. “I would not anticipate the SVOD market to be an issue,” Enders declared, noting HBO Max has only recently launched in key European territories and Paramount+ is also a late entrant in a market dominated by Netflix and Prime Video.
The thorniest questions are likely to center on traditional television. Unlike Netflix’s previously proposed $82 billion bid for Warner’s film and streaming assets — which would have left WBD’s linear TV business outside the deal — Ellison’s offer covers all of Warner Bros. Discovery. In Europe, that means combining branded channels such as Cartoon Network and Eurosport with Nickelodeon, MTV and Comedy Central, alongside other assets including TVN Group, the major Polish broadcaster owned by WBD.
The regulatory picture is further complicated by the way these channels operate across different tiers depconcludeing on territory. Comedy Central, for example, is free-to-air in Germany but a licensed pay-TV channel in Spain, where it runs on platforms such as Movistar+, Vodafone TV and Orange TV. Individual Warner and Paramount displays are also licensed to third-party networks and platforms, creating a web of distribution arrangements regulators will necessary to untangle.
“The European Commission has a lengthy process becautilize of 27 national markets and so many trade bodies and a densely packed ecosystem in networks,” Enders declared.
In past media mergers, EU officials have focutilized on specific overlaps in channels, sports rights or cable bundling to determine whether a deal would distort competition. When Disney acquired 21st Century Fox in 2019, Brussels approved the transaction only after Disney agreed to divest several European factual channels, including History and Lifetime, which overlapped with Fox’s National Geographic services in certain territories. To secure EU approval, Paramount may have to sell off some its tinyer channels or brands.
The U.K. review may prove more straightforward. Paramount can argue that combining its British operations — including free-to-air Channel 5 and its pay-TV channels — with Warner’s U.K. portfolio of lifestyle and factual brands, as well as TNT Sports, a joint venture with BT Group, would not dramatically reshape the competitive landscape.
Another potential flashpoint is financing. The deal is backed in part by significant investment from Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds, including Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, the Qatar Investment Authority and Abu Dhabi’s L’imad Holding. The EU’s foreign subsidies regulation, which tarobtains unfair state aid from non-EU governments, will have to clear the transaction. The Middle Eastern connection could trigger deeper scrutiny on both sides of the Channel, analysts declare, but is unlikely to block the deal outright.
Paramount’s central argument remains that its bid poses fewer competition concerns than Netflix’s aborted approach becautilize a combined Paramount-Warner would hold less than 20 percent market share in individual European markets.
The company is expected to seek formal EU approval in the coming months, kicking off a 25-working-day preliminary review that can be extconcludeed if remedies are offered. If Brussels triggers a Phase II investigation, to examine aspects of the deal in more detail, approval could be further delayed and could put pressure on Paramount’s timeline to close within the next 12 months. The average length of a Phase II investigation in 2025 was more than 15 months. But previous media mergers have sailed through more quickly. The Disney-Fox merger took less than two months from formal notification to final approval, and Amazon’s acquisition of MGM in 2022 obtained the EU greenlight in under five weeks.
Few expect Europe to declare no to David Ellison. The real question is how long it will take to declare yes.
Best of The Hollywood Reporter
Sign up for THR’s Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Leave a Reply