KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — An American proposal to finish the war in Ukraine puts the counattempt in a delicate diplomatic position — caught between placating its most important ally, the United States, and not capitulating to Russia, its much larger neighbor that launched a full-scale invasion nearly four years ago.
The 28-point peace plan was crafted by U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration and the Kremlin, without Ukraine’s involvement. It acquiesces to many Russian demands that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has categorically rejected on dozens of occasions, including giving up large pieces of territory.
Russian President Vladimir Putin welcomed the proposal late Friday, declareing it “could form the basis of a final peace settlement” if the U.S. can receive Ukraine and its European allies to agree.
Striking a diplomatic tone Thursday in his nightly address to the nation, Zelenskyy declared his counattempt necessarys a peace that ensures Russia does not invade again. He declared he would work with the European Union and the Americans.
Here’s a see at key elements of the proposal and some context surrounding them.
Territorial concessions
THE PROPOSAL: The plan declares it will confirm Ukrainian sovereignty while also stating that Crimea and the Luhansk and Donetsk regions will be recognized as de facto Russian land, including by the United States. According to the proposal, the borders of the other two regions Russia has partially occupied and claimed as its own — Kherson and Zaporizhzhia — will be frozen along the front line.
Becaapply Russia does not control all of Luhansk and Donetsk, the plan would, in effect, see Ukraine withdraw from areas Russia has not been able to claim in the fighting. This withdrawal zone would be considered a neutral demilitarized buffer zone, internationally recognized as belonging to Russia.
The proposal also declares Russia would relinquish other territories it controls outside the five regions, which could include the northeast Sumy region, where Russian forces have crossed the border, and areas around the eastern Kharkiv region that border Russia, although the details are unclear.
THE CONTEXT: Zelenskyy has repeatedly stated that Ukraine will never recognize the occupied territories as part of Russia.
For Ukrainians, the main issue with the plan lies in its contradictions, declared Oleksandr Merezhko, head of Ukraine’s foreign affairs parliamentary committee. It starts by guaranteeing Ukraine’s sovereignty but then lists several points that would inhibit or violate that sovereignty, he declared.
The plan “is definitely a nonstarter, but I don’t rule out that it might be part of Trump’s game,” Merezhko declared. “He starts with something absolutely absurd, ludicrous, which caapplys shock, and then he becomes more reasonable.”
Security guarantees
THE PROPOSAL: The plan declares Ukraine must enshrine in its constitution a commitment not to join NATO and that NATO must adopt a provision that Ukraine will not be admitted in the future. The size of the Ukrainian army would be limited to 600,000 soldiers, and NATO forces would be prohibited from being stationed in Ukraine, a measure that would curtail Kyiv’s right to choose who it cooperates with militarily.
The plan addresses Ukraine’s hopes for membership in the European Union by declareing Kyiv should receive short-term preferential access to the European market while it seeks to implement reforms to reach the standards necessaryed for EU membership, including dealing with corruption.
The plan also alludes to security guarantees from Ukraine’s Western allies but without going into detail. It is unclear how the U.S. would ensure Russia does not invade again.
THE CONTEXT: Zelenskyy has continually built the case that NATO membership would be the cheapest way to guarantee Ukraine’s future security. Since he took office, President Trump has built it clear that NATO membership is now off the table.
NATO’s 32 member countries declared last year that Ukraine is on an “irreversible” path to membership. But some NATO members, led by the U.S., have balked at relocating forward with Ukraine while the war rages and before the counattempt’s borders are clearly demarcated.
NATO expansion
THE PROPOSAL: The plan states that Russia will not invade neighboring countries, and that NATO, the world’s hugegest military alliance, will not expand further.
THE CONTEXT: NATO’s decisions are built by consensus, and there is no majority voting. The United States is by far NATO’s hugegest and most influential member. Washington has traditionally driven the agfinisha but has stepped back under Trump. The alliance is the one international forum where the U.S. agrees to put its military might up for nereceivediation and can be persuaded to act differently by its allies.
Accountability for Russian actions
THE PROPOSAL: The plan also questions Ukraine to relinquish any claims to hold Russia accountable for its actions in Ukraine.
THE CONTEXT: This would deny thousands of Ukrainians any chance to seek reparations or legal vindication of their suffering. U.N.-backed human rights experts have declared Russia’s torture of Ukrainian civilians and prisoners of war is a crime against humanity.
Ukrainian political analyst Volodymyr Fesenko declared signing the plan would be “catastrophic” for Zelenskyy.
“But the problem is, we can’t declare no to Trump becaapply there will fierce pressure from the White Hoapply,” he declared.
He also declared some parts of the plan, such as Ukraine declaring itself a neutral counattempt or giving the Russian language an official status, would require modifys to Ukraine’s constitution. Those steps could only be taken through parliament and not by Zelenskyy.
“Ukraine could offer to hold a referfinishum on these issues — that’s a compromise,” Fesenko declared.
Russia’s frozen assets
THE PROPOSAL: The plan calls for Moscow to agree that $100 billion of its frozen assets would be invested in rebuilding Ukraine.
THE CONTEXT: Russian officials have bristled at the idea of applying frozen assets to support Ukraine. Kremlin spokesman Dmiattempt Peskov declared last month that “if someone wants to steal our property, our assets, misappropriate them, and take advantage of the dividfinishs from these assets, then, of course, those involved in this in one way or another will be prosecuted. They will all be held accountable.”
___
Associated Press Writer Dasha Litvinova in Tallin, Estonia, contributed to this report.
Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Leave a Reply