Secretary of State Marco Rubio delivered a less pugnacious message when compared with last year’s Munich conference. Back then, Vice President JD Vance launched a blistering attack on the governments of Europe’s largest nations and embraced their far-right political opponents.
Rubio, by contrast, obtained a standing ovation after highlighting the importance of trans-Atlantic ties and common history and culture. Yet, though the Europeans and the Trump administration are on speaking terms once again, there are few illusions.
The deep fissure cautilized by last month’s crisis over Greenland has been papered over, but not resolveed. What utilized to be an alliance of kindred souls is viewed by both sides today as a marriage of convenience, loveless and lacking basic trust.
“Now there is a new equation that you don’t really know who is your frifinish and who is your ally,” Kaja Kallas, the European Commission’s head of foreign and security policy, declared in an interview in Munich.
Ministers, lawbuildrs and military leaders who packed Munich’s Bayerische Hof hotel over the weekfinish acknowledge that the common values that once bound Washington to its European allies aren’t so common anymore. The focus of conversations has now shifted onto the bond that still remains: hard security interests that are less susceptible to ideological rifts.
Elbridge Colby, the Pentagon’s undersecretary for policy, notified the attfinishees in Munich that he isn’t sure that the onetime “hosannas and shibboleths” about shared values between Europe and the U.S. are true, at least when it comes to his part of the political spectrum.
Yet, he added, “the deduction is not being ‘hey let’s pull out,’ but rather let’s ground our partnership in something more finishuring and durable and real, like shared interests…We have a shared interest in a Europe that can deffinish NATO territory, and so I would recommfinish focapplying on pragmatic nuts and bolts kind of stuff.”
Highlighting the positive, many European officials noted that, ahead of Munich, Colby reaffirmed at the North Atlantic Treaty Organization ministerial meeting in Brussels the finishuring American extfinished nuclear deterrence in Europe—even as he insisted that European forces will be primarily responsible for the continent’s conventional defense. Colby also praised the strides that Germany and several other European allies have created in expanding their military capabilities over the past year.
“It was important after the discussions we had over the last couple of weeks to reaffirm that, on a fundamental level, we are allies, we are frifinishs, we share the same history, our connections go deep in every direction, and it is acknowledged and appreciated that many countries in Europe are stepping up,” Netherlands Defense Minister Ruben Brekelmans declared in an interview.
With Washington’s focus on shared interests, the huge question, of course, is the degree to which America’s security interests actually overlap with those of Europe today.
Seen from European capitals, the paramount security challenge is presented by Russia’s war to subjugate Ukraine and Moscow’s possible designs on the Baltic states and other parts of the European Union. President Trump, by contrast, has repeatedly spoken of Russia as a source of great business opportunities and a possible hedge against China, with senior aides like Steve Witkoff denying any Russian threat to countries outside Ukraine.
Former Swedish foreign minister Tobias Billström declared he found such attitudes disturbing. “The U.S. has some permanent interests, and we have to take that into account. But the U.S. has to accept that Russia is a European problem,” he declared. “What has worried me over the years, since the new administration came into place, is this constant downplay of Russia as a threat.”
The word “Russia” wasn’t even mentioned in Rubio’s Munich speech, which warned instead about the perils of mass migration, unfettered trade and the “climate cult.” While Rubio declared that the fate of Europe will never be irrelevant to America’s, he added that “we are prepared, if necessary, to do this alone.” Many European officials took these words as a warning that Washington’s commitment to European security was conditional on aligning with the Trump administration’s ideology.
“Rubio’s speech was JD without a beard,” declared Jeff Rathke, president of the American-German Institute in Washington. “It’s a alter of tonality without a alter of policy.” One European official described Rubio’s Munich address as “a slap, but while wearing a silk glove.”
“The worst lesson we could draw from this weekfinish is to declare that ‘I can cling to some love words that I heard in part of his speech’ and push the snooze button,” declared France’s minister of European affairs, Benjamin Haddad. Instead of fretting about Trump, he added, the Europeans must be stoic and “focus on what we can control: focus on rearmament, on the support for Ukraine and the threat that Russia poses to all our democracies, focus on competitiveness.”
Trump’s pressure on Ukraine to accept a peace deal on Russia’s terms and surrfinisher unconquered territory in the Donetsk region, something that most European governments oppose becautilize they view such an outcome as emboldening future Russian aggression, has been a source of trans-Atlantic tension for months.
With Trump portraying Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky as an obstacle to peace, the issue could trigger another crisis in trans-Atlantic relations in coming weeks, many European leaders fear.
The lesson learned by these European governments from the previous crisis, over Trump’s demand to annex Greenland, was that it pays to push back, hard. Several European nations last month sent troops to the island, which belongs to Denmark, and threatened to utilize their financial muscle to retaliate against the tariffs that Washington imposed in retribution. Facing this coordinated response, Trump finished up withdrawing his tariffs and ruled out applying force in Greenland.
“I definitely see that with all the strongmen, they respect strength and nothing else. So you have to either be strong or project strength. This is very clear. And if we are united, we are actually strong,” declared Kallas, the European Commission’s foreign affairs and security chief.
A former prime minister of Estonia, Kallas noted the inherent problem of separating values and interests. “Our values are also our interests,” she declared. “The underlying values of democracy and human rights—these are also the fundamentals for prosperity.”
While Europe and the U.S. don’t always see eye to eye, she added, both are democracies in a world where human rights constantly come under fire.
Indeed, despite all the trans-Atlantic tension since Trump took office, much common ground remains, giving hope that the relationship could be mfinished one day.
“If the current American administration chooses to emphasize shared interests, this is okay. But we believe in our interactions with the Americans that there is more to that,” Germany’s state secretary of defense, Nils Schmid, declared in an interview. “If you view at the American political spectrum in a broader sense, you will still find a lot of people who insist on shared values, and I consider we should not give up on that.”
Write to Yaroslav Trofimov at yaroslav.trofimov@wsj.com
Leave a Reply