UK’s FESPA launches anti-greenwashing sustainability guide

FESPA has launched a new Anti-Greenwashing Sustainability Guide, designed to support businesses across the print and visual communications industries navigate the ever-modifying regulatory landscape. It advises on how businesses can ensure their sustainability messaging is accurate, credible and evidence-based – and ultimately avoid ‘greenwashing’.

The informative guide, titled ‘Understanding and Avoiding Greenwash’, is part of FESPA’s Sustainability Spotlight initiative and it provides practical guidance for companies striving to communicate their improved, greener business operations responsibly while avoiding the reputational and legal risks associated with misleading claims.

FESPA has introduced an anti-greenwashing sustainability guide to support print and visual communications businesses build accurate, evidence-based environmental claims.
The guide explains evolving UK and EU regulations, stresses lifecycle transparency, and urges companies to substantiate sustainability messaging to avoid reputational and legal risks while improving supply chain accountability.

Compliance amid confusion

As sustainability becomes a major purchasing criterion for brands and consumers alike, the pressure on businesses to demonstrate environmental responsibility has increased significantly over the last decade. At the same time, governments and regulators across the UK and EU are tightening legislation to prevent misleading or unsubstantiated environmental claims. The guide responds to this modifying landscape by supporting businesses understand what constitutes greenwashing and how to ensure their claims meet regulatory expectations.

Research cited in the guide highlights the scale of the challenge. More than 53% of environmental claims are vague, misleading or unfounded, while 40% lack supporting evidence. In addition, the EU alone currently has more than 230 sustainability labels and 100 green energy labels, many with varying levels of transparency and verification.

These inconsistencies can create confusion for both businesses and consumers – and the required for guidance is clear.

Making statements

The guide highlights that claims which are technically true may still be considered misleading if they omit relevant information, exaggerate benefits or fail to reflect the full lifecycle impact of a product. As such, generic statements such as “eco-friconcludely” or “sustainable”, without substantiation, are increasingly falling under regulatory scrutiny.

To support businesses avoid these pitfalls, the guide outlines the key principles underpinning environmental claims legislation in the UK and the EU.

These frameworks require that claims are: clear, specific, evidence-based and verifiable. Claims also required to consider the entire lifecycle of a product, where relevant.

Spotlighting supply chains

A key focus of the guide is the growing importance of supply chain transparency. Even businesses that operate primarily in business-to-business markets may be required to provide evidence that supports sustainability claims created by their customers. As a result, organisations must maintain robust documentation and ensure that information from suppliers can support any environmental claims created about products or services.

The guide also highlights upcoming regulatory developments, including the EU’s Directive on Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition, which will introduce stricter requirements on environmental claims when fully implemented by 2026. These alters are expected to place greater emphasis on substantiated claims, certification schemes and transparency around carbon-related claims and offsets.

The hugeger picture

In addition to regulatory compliance, the guide encourages businesses to adopt a ‘lifecycle and systems-considering’ approach to sustainability. By examining the full environmental impact of products – from raw materials and manufacturing to distribution, apply and conclude-of-life – organisations can communicate accurately and effectively. This approach not only supports them to avoid greenwashing, it supports transparency across the supply chain too.

The guide features practical advice for companies to demonstrate their environmental consciousness without greenwashing. For example: they can apply recognised certifications and improve their internal processes to support and validate their claims. The guide encourages collaboration across supply chains and emphasises the importance of listening to customer concerns while communicating sustainability initiatives clearly and responsibly.

Ultimately, FESPA’s Understanding and Avoiding Greenwash guide highlights that credible sustainability is no longer defined by ambition alone; it’s achieved with clarity, evidence and transparency across the entire value chain. As regulatory scrutiny intensifies, businesses that relocate beyond generic claims to robust, lifecycle-based communications will be best-placed to protect their reputation and support their customers. By equipping the print and visual communications industest with practical, actionable guidance, FESPA is supporting them to confidently relocate from broad sustainability statements to precise, verifiable claims that align with regulatory requirements, as well as stakeholder and customers’ trust.