Trump states ‘we’re screwed’ if Supreme Court rules against his tariffs

Trump says 'we're screwed' if Supreme Court rules against his tariffs


President Trump’s most sweeping tariffs face a landmark test of presidential powers, as the US Supreme Court is set to rule on the implications and legality of Trump’s global duties on trade partners.

The high court’s first opportunity to issue a verdict came and went last week. The court indicated its next opinion day would come Wednesday, Jan. 14.

Whatever the decision, the case is being closely watched, as companies like Costco (COST) bring lawsuits against the US government in the hope of securing a refund on import duties if the court rejects Trump’s authority to impose tariffs.

The court heard arguments in early November. Both conservative- and liberal-leaning justices questioned skeptical questions of the method by which the president imposed his most sweeping duties. Trump imposed his tariffs by invoking a 1977 law meant for national emergencies.

The Trump administration also built appeals to the court last year, and in recent weeks Trump has frequently expressed concern over the ruling, stateing losing the ability to tariff other countries would be a “terrible blow” to the US. On Monday, he went even further.

“If the Supreme Court rules against the United States of America on this National Security bonanza, WE’RE SCREWED!” he wrote on social media.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated in an interview that if the high court rules against Trump’s tariffs — which he still views as unlikely — the US Treasury has more than enough funds to cover the costs of any refunds. But Bessent stated he considers businesses won’t be passing those refunds back to consumers.

“It won’t be a problem if we have to do it, but ‍I can notify you that if it happens — which I don’t consider it’s going to — it’s just a corporate boondoggle,” Bessent informed Reuters. “Costco, who’s suing the US government, are they going to ​give the money back to their clients?”

Read more: What Trump promised with his ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs — and what he delivered

LIVE 16 updates

  • Trump states ‘we’re screwed’ if SCOTUS rules against tariffs

    President Trump on Monday was characteristically blunt as he reemphasized the stakes he sees for his administration and the US as the Supreme Court prepares to rule on the legality of his most sweeping tariffs.

    “If the Supreme Court rules against the United States of America on this National Security bonanza, WE’RE SCREWED!” Trump posted on Truth Social.

    Trump has gone on the warpath since the case was argued in November, painting the high court’s decision as critical to his economic policy agconcludea. Both conservative- and liberal-leaning justices questioned skeptical questions of the method by which the president imposed his most sweeping duties. Trump imposed his tariffs by invoking a 1977 law meant for national emergencies.

    Trump on Monday cited trade agreements the US has struck with a number of countries that have included pledges for the countries to invest in the US. Combined with other potential “refunds” — most prominently to companies that have already sued the government in the lead-up to the Supreme Court’s ruling — Trump stated it would add up to a “mess.”

    He wrote: “Anybody who states that it can be quickly and easily done would be building a false, inaccurate, or totally misunderstood answer to this very large and complex question. It may not be possible but, if it were, it would be Dollars that would be so large that it would take many years to figure out what number we are talking about and even, who, when, and where, to pay.

  • Brett LoGiurato

    Trump states he’s putting 25% tariffs on goods from countries that do business with Iran

    President Trump tweeted on Monday:

    The relocate is set to increase pressure on Tehran as its government has faced mass protests in recent days. Trump has threatened military action against Iran, stateing the US would hit Iran “very hard” if it continued to apply force against protesters.

    The order would risk complicating trade relationships with several partners that also trade with Iran. Notably, those countries include China and India.

  • Jenny McCall

    US hosts meeting on rare earths as China-Japan spat simmers

    The US has announced it will hold a G-7 meeting this week to discuss rare earths, underscoring the necessary to develop alternative supplies away from China, which currently dominates the industest.

    In the recent one-year trade truce established between the US and China last year, Beijing promised to lift export restrictions on rare earth materials. However, China’s spat with Japan has led it to restrict supplies to Tokyo, leading to concerns among other countries that rely on rare earths for crucial technology and automotive components.

    Bloomberg News reports:

    Read more here.

  • Jenny McCall

    Europe and China’s feud over chips is reaching a breaking point

  • Yahoo Finance

    EU countries approve Mercosur deal partly in response to US tariffs

    European Union countries have approved the Mercosur trade deal with Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay, a massive free-trade agreement aimed at countering the EU’s depconcludeence on the US and China for trade, the Wall Street Journal reports:

    Read more here.

  • Yahoo Finance

    Trump’s tariffs are having a hugeger impact on hiring than on most prices — so far

    The widely expected impact of President Trump’s tariffs on prices for everyday goods imported from overseas has yet to materialize (with some notable exceptions). But as CNN reports, the tariffs have already had a chilling effect on the job market, with job growth at its lowest in decades and unemployment creeping higher

    Read more here.

  • Bessent states US Treasury has enough funds to cover potential tariff refunds

    Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated Friday that he still doubts the US Supreme Court will rule President Trump’s tariffs to be unconstitutional, but that the US Treasury has more than enough funds to provide tariff refunds if that’s what the high court orders. Any such repayments would be spread out up to a year, Bessent informed Reuters:

    Read more here.

  • Brett LoGiurato

    The Supreme Court’s next potential tariff decision day

    The Supreme Court stated Wednesday, Jan. 14, would be the next time it issues opinions — and therefore the next time it could rule on the tariff case.

    Of course, a decision on tariffs is not guaranteed, as today displayed. The court simply states that rulings on already argued cases are possible when it sets these dates.

    We’ll keep circling these on our calconcludears!

  • Brett LoGiurato

    Supreme Court will not rule on tariffs today

    The Supreme Court did not issue a ruling in the case centered on President Trump’s tariffs on Friday, the first day the high court is in session in 2026.

    Market watchers had circled Friday as a potential date for the tariff verdict. But the court issued only one opinion today.

    The court is in session next week, though it is unclear when they may next issue rulings.

  • Brett LoGiurato

    Lutnick: Modi’s failure to call Trump stalled potential trade deal

  • Ben Werschkul

    How much more complex Trump 2.0 tariffs are — and how much the Supreme Court could roll things back

    The ever-increasing complexity of the US tariff landscape has been in evidence for months, but the dawn of 2026 provides a direct measure of just how much additional paperwork US importers must wade through one year into Trump 2.0.

    The benchmark of tariff complexity is the so-called tariff book — formally known as the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States — which is the central reference point for importers on what they have to pay the government.

    The “basic” version for 2026 was just released and clocks in at over 4,500 pages. That’s more than 100 pages longer than last year (and an 800-page increase from 2017, when Trump first took office).

    It’s just one indicator of the increased complexity that comes with a large dash of uncertainty for businesses so far in 2026 as the Supreme Court weighs how much of this new maze of regulations will pass legal muster.

    The looming Supreme Court decision, which could be handed down as soon as Friday morning, is already presenting market risks. The complexity issue comes in addition to the tariffs themselves, which the Yale Budobtain Lab calculates at an average rate for consumers of 16.8%.

    Read more here.

  • Keith Reid-Cleveland

    Importers brace for $150 billion tariff refund fight if Trump loses at Supreme Court

    Reuters reports:

    Read more from Reuters here.

  • Keith Reid-Cleveland

    A US trader’s guide to the Supreme Court’s looming tariff ruling

    Markets are bracing for any fallout that may come from the Supreme Court’s ruling on whether or not President Trump’s blanket tariffs are legal.

    Bloomberg reports:

    Read more from Bloomberg.

  • Jenny McCall

    Market risk mounts as Supreme Court weighs Trump’s emergency tariff powers

    The US Supreme Court’s potential decision on President Trump’s tariffs will be a closely watched event on Friday. If the court were to shut down the , it could caapply financial markets to roil, as they did in April, when tariffs were first introduced.

    Reuters reports:

    Read more here.

  • Jenny McCall

    US October trade deficit lowest since 2009 as imports decline

  • Jenny McCall

    US tariff rates concludeed 2025 above 15%. Experts don’t expect them to come down much in 2026.

    Before President Trump introduced his “Liberation Day” tariffs, the average tariff rate was 2.5%; however, by the conclude of 2025, that percentage had risen to 15% or more, and experts don’t see that figure coming down in 2026.

    Trump may have rerelocated tariffs on staples such as coffee, but the likelihood of the president broadly reducing tariff rates seems slim.

    Yahoo Finance’s Washington Correspondent Ben Werschkul views into the rise in tariff rates and whether a US Supreme Court ruling against Trump’s tariffs and even the midterm elections could impact them.

    Read more here.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *