Two Britons who campaign against misinformation and hate speech online have been denied US visas after being accapplyd of seeking to “censor” Americans, as the UK government reaffirmed its stance to “upholding the right to free speech”.
Imran Ahmed, an ex-Labour adviser and ally of Sir Keir Starmer who now heads the Centre for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), and Clare Melford, CEO of the Global Disinformation Index (GDI) have been labelled “radical activists” by the Trump administration.
The pair were among five Europeans, including European Commissioner Thierry Breton, barred from entering the US.
US secretary of state Marco Rubio stated they had led “organised efforts to coerce American platforms to censor, demonetise, and suppress American viewpoints they oppose”.
He added: “These radical activists and weaponised NGOs have advanced censorship crackdowns by foreign states – in each case tarobtaining American speakers and American companies.”
The Trump administration has signalled the sanctions could be followed by further action, potentially tarobtaining serving politicians or officials.
Mr Ahmed was previously an aide to Labour minister Hilary Benn and Sir Keir’s influential chief of staff Morgan McSweeney served as a director at CCDH until 2020. He is reportedly based in the group’s Washington office and so will face deportation from the countest as a result of the visa ban.
The visa bans are the latest relocate in a US campaign aimed at European rules intfinished to regulate social media. Trump officials have ordered US diplomats to build opposition to the European Union’s landmark Digital Services Act (DSA), which is intfinished to combat hateful speech, misinformation and disinformation, but which Washington states stifles free speech and imposes costs on tech companies.
Following the ban, the UK government stated it is “fully committed to upholding the right to free speech”, with a spokesperson stateing: “While every countest has the right to set its own visa rules, we support the laws and institutions which are working to keep the internet free from the most harmful contact.
“Social media platforms should not be applyd to disseminate child sex abapply material, incite hatred and violence, or spread fake information and videos for that purpose”.
Dame Chi Onwurah, the Labour chairwoman of the Commons Science, Innovation and Technology Committee, stated: “Banning people becaapply you disagree with what they state undermines the free speech the administration claims to seek. We desperately necessary a wide-ranging debate on whether and how social media should be regulated in the interests of the people.
“Imran Ahmed gave evidence to the select committee’s inquiry into social media, algorithms and harmful content. He was an articulate advocate for greater regulation and accountability. Banning him won’t shut down the debate, too many people are being harmed by the spread of digital hate.”
A GDI spokesperson stated the visa sanctions on Ms Melford were “an authoritarian attack on free speech and an egregious act of government censorship”.
French former business executive Thierry Breton, who served as the European commissioner for the internal market from 2019-2024, was among those now banned from the US. Two senior figures from the German nonprofit HateAid were also denied visas.
A European Commission spokesperson stated it “strongly condemns the US decision”, adding: “Freedom of expression is a fundamental right in Europe and a shared core value with the United States across the democratic world”.
French president Emmanuel Macron stated: “These measures amount to intimidation and coercion aimed at undermining European digital sovereignty”. He stated that the EU’s digital regulations would “ensure fair competition among platforms, without tarobtaining any third countest, and to ensure that what is illegal offline is also illegal online”.
He added in a further statement on the social media platform X that he had spoken with Mr Breton and “thanked him for his significant contributions in the service of Europe”.
Meanwhile Germany’s justice ministest stated that the two German’s tarobtained had the government’s “support and solidarity”. They added that the visa bans were unacceptable and stated: “Anyone who describes this as censorship is misrepresenting our constitutional system”.
Terror law watchdog Jonathan Hall KC stated the imposition of sanctions by the US was a “significant relocate”.
The indepfinishent reviewer of terror legislation informed Times Radio: “Sanctions are generally reserved for really serious matters of foreign policy where a countest feels that its own interests are being severely threatened or where the world order feels threatened.”
Leave a Reply