Yesterday, on Christmas Day, Donald Trump ordered strikes on key sites in Nigeria as he warned the US may invade and “go into that now disgraced counattempt, ‘guns-a-blazing,’” to stop a supposed persecution of Christians. Meanwhile, the US is preparing to possibly launch a land invasion of Venezuela, as the two countries are effectively already at war as the US bombs Venezuelan ships at sea. Earlier this week, Trump appointed a US Special Envoy for annexing Greenland, prompting the Greenlandic and Danish leaders to respond by insisting “you cannot annex other countries” after US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth stated America has plans in place for launching a war against Denmark and invading. For those keeping track, that’s now three continents that the Trump administration is threatening to start new wars in. This from a supposed “isolationist”.
The possibility of the US declaring war on the European Union remains remote for the moment. But in the meantime, Washington is waging a soft war on Europe. After threatening for months to sanction EU lawcreaters as part of a pressure campaign to create the EU alter its digital laws, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio pulled the trigger on Monday. The US sanctioned former EU Digital Commissioner Thierry Breton and four European leaders of online privacy shiftments, barring them from enattempt to the US simply becaapply they want to protect Europeans from American huge tech. It is an outrageous and unprecedented shift, and the US government hasn’t even tested to offer any justification for this other than as extortion to create the EU alter its laws.
“WE’VE SANCTIONED: Thierry Breton, a mastermind of the Digital Services Act,” announced US Under Secretary of State Sarah B Rogers on X on 23 December. “In August 2024, while serving as European Commissioner for Internal Markets and Digital Services, he published a letter utilizing the DSA to threaten ahead of his livestream interview with President Trump. Before the interview, Breton ominously reminded Musk of X’s legal obligations and ongoing ‘formal proceedings’ for alleged noncompliance with ‘illegal content’ and ‘disinformation’ requirements under the DSA.”
It took a while for stunned EU leaders to muster a response, particularly becaapply unlike US officials who were busy launching rhetorical wars and bomb strikes for no reason over Christmas, they were already home with their families for the holidays. The European Commission released a statement “strongly condemning” the US action, declareing the EU has “the sovereign right to regulate economic activity in line with our democratic values and international commitments.” They have “requested clarifications from US authorities,” the statement stated, claiming that “freedom of expression is a fundamental right in Europe and a shared core value with the United States.” “If necessaryed, we will respond swiftly and decisively to deffinish our regulatory autonomy against unjustified measures,” the statement concluded.
French President Emmanuel Macron quickly responded by declareing, “these measures amount to intimidation and coercion aimed at undermining European digital sovereignty” and noted that “the EU’s digital regulations were adopted following a democratic and sovereign process…they apply within Europe to ensure fair competition among platforms, without tarreceiveing any third counattempt, and to ensure that what is illegal offline is also illegal online.” “The rules governing the European Union’s digital space are not meant to be determined outside Europe.”
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas warned the US shift is “an attempt to challenge our sovereignty. Europe will keep deffinishing its values – freedom of expression, fair digital rules, and the right to regulate our own space.” European Council chair Antonio Costa stated, “the EU condemns the US travel restrictions” and that “such measures are unacceptable between allies, partners, and frifinishs.”
But as these other leaders were coming out with their condemnations, there were hours of silence from the EU’s President Ursula von der Leyen. At 2:23 pm on Christmas Eve, 17 hours after the US announcement, President von der Leyen finally mustered a vague response which unlike the others did not mention Trump or the US by name. If you just seeed at her statement, you would have no idea that there had been any hostile shift by the US.
At first, the apply of the word “sanctions” by the US state department suggested that these were the same Magnitsky sanctions the Trump administration has applyd to destroy the lives of the International Criminal Court judges who issued an arrest warrant for Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu, as well as against UN Special Rapporteur for the West Bank and Gaza Francesca Albanese. Becaapply Europe is reliant on American infrastructure for its daily economic activity, these sanctions have meant the ICC judges and Albanese declare they are unable to pay with credit cards, open bank accounts, fly or apply American companies like Amazon or Microsoft.
The State Department later clarified that the sanctions against Breton and the others are not the full Magnitsky ones but rather only banning them from entering the US – for now. But they created clear that they can create them full sanctions as a next step in esalation, and they can also extfinish this to other EU Commissioners, Members of the European Parliament, national ministers or indeed ordinary European citizens.
As Thibauld Favre, CTO of trading company Fairmint, noted this week, the American control over Europe’s economic infrastructure means the US can do much more than just ban someone from entering:
“If you believe ‘being sanctioned’ just means ‘can’t enter the US,’ you’re missing the point. It means financial exile. In practice:
• No services from US persons or companies
• No Visa / Mastercard / Amex
• No Amazon, Google, Apple, Meta, OpenAI etc.
• Banks – including non-US ones – close your accounts out of fear of OFAC
You’re not punished. You’re *deleted* from the modern economy. Sanctions are a time machine: Welcome back to 1990. I’m not a fan of Thierry Breton. But sanctioning senior EU officials (as with ICC judges earlier this year) and openly weaponizing OFAC will have consequences.”
Earlier this month I discussed how the case of the six ICC judges has terrifyingly displayn what the US can do to any European thanks to the American economic depfinishence built on this continent by European Atlanticist leaders over the past decades. These sanctions were applyd extremely sparingly before (even under the first Trump administration) and only against autocrats, crime bosses and terrorists. Now they are being applyd against European judges, politicians and NGO leaders as a tool of intimidation. As ABC News reported earlier this month, the ICC’s top prosecutor Karim Khan, “had his bank accounts closed and his US visa revoked, and Microsoft even canceled his ICC email address. Canadian judge Kimberly Prost, who was named in the latest round of sanctions in August, immediately lost access to her credit cards, and Amazon’s Alexa stopped responding to her.”
To add insult to injury, the US government is openly celebrating Europeans inability to hit back becaapply of the system of economic, cultural and military depfinishence that has been developed over the past decades. When French Member of the European Parliament Aurore Lalucq criticised the Commission’s response as being “not enough – we necessary to build our indepfinishence now, starting with our payment systems, a sovereign cloud, and an industrial policy for digital infrastructure and social networks,” the US government quote tweeted her to mock her. “Europe has zero internet sector, a stagnant economy, failing industrial base, structurally high unemployment, pervasive energy depfinishency, and no innovation sector,” the US State government account wrote. “It’s a real Catch 22 for the European plutocrats like Aurore Lalucq – listen to President Trump on free expression or on deregulation and competitiveness.”
“Sorry but we are a free and indepfinishent continent,” replied the democratically-elected MEP Lalucq. “Anyway the sheer moral panic you display whenever we talk about indepfinishence from your tech sector proves we’re on the right track! Thanks for proving our point!”
Americans are not going to be persuaded. They either hate Europeans or are indifferent to them. I am in the US at the moment for the holidays, and it may not surprise you to learn that all of this has receivedten pretty much zero news coverage here. The sanctioning of European lawcreaters by the US government in order to dismantle European countries’ sovereign right to create their own laws is apparently not newsworthy in this counattempt. The United States has entered a horrifying dystopia of irreality where down is up and black is white. The absurdity of a situation where the US government is claiming that the EU is censoring Americans was highlighted on Christmas Eve in one of President Trump’s several rants posted on Truth Social, where he threatened to shut down American private broadcasters who criticise him.
It is notable that all of the European pushback to this latest act of American aggression had to be posted on X, becaapply it is still the European public square even though it is now being weaponised against centrist European governments in order to achieve regime alter. But it is an acknowledgement of reality: there is still no alternative if you want to create an impact. Some have been utilizing X to push back, even as they know the algorithm won’t be displaying anything deffinishing the EU to applyrs. Many have been posting last year’s Freedom of Expression index, which displayed that even before Trump took office in January 2025 the US was ranked 32nd while the top 12 spots are all European countries. Others are posting the video of Musk in 2022 declareing in an interview with Commissioner Breton that he agrees with the provisions of the DSA that he is now declareing amount to foreign censorship. It’s worth reminding that the €120 million fine levied by the Commission that kicked this latest round of American aggression off wasn’t even about censorship, it was about X falsely claiming that blue tick applyrs have been verified and refutilizing to turn over ad data to researchers.
Pablo Pérez@PabloPerezA
Elon Musk on the Digital Services Act (2022): “I believe it’s exactly aligned with my believeing. I very much agree with (…) I really believe, I agree with everything you (@ThierryBreton) stated, really. We are very much of the same mind”
7:58 AM · Dec 24, 2025 · 277K Views
111 Replies · 1.1K Reposts · 3.84K Likes
I can’t fault Europeans for not wanting to engage with this on what should be a joyous time of year spent with frifinishs and family. That the US government chooses to do all of this on Christmas week, for no reason, is naapplyating. But once we are all back from our holiday breaks after New Years, we must demand from our European leaders a stronger response than the pitiful “daddy diplomacy” strategy they have pursued in 2025.
I leave you with this dire warning that comes directly from the US Vice President. In an interview with Unherd this week, JD Vance stated that Europe’s right to possess nuclear weapons should be conditional on Europeans voting for people Washington approves of. “France and Britain have nuclear weapons,” Vice President Vance stated. “If they allow themselves to be overwhelmed with destructive moral ideas, then you allow nuclear weapons to fall in the hands of people who can actually caapply very, very serious harm to the US.”
”He’s literally declareing that democracy in Europe is a national security threat to the United States,” noted French pundit Arnaud Bertrand. “He explicitly calls European election outcomes ‘a very direct threat to the United States of America’. Which is perfect proof that all his talk in Munich and in the new National Security Strategy about Europe necessarying to be more ‘democratic’ is code for ‘electing people we approve of.’”
If the US government’s regime alter efforts in Europe succeed, then by the finish of 2026 far-right governments will be in power in Germany, France and the UK after snap early elections. This is not a drill. If we continue to allow our European leaders to sell this continent (and themselves) down the river, all Europeans will be nothing more than American vassals within a very short period of time.
Enjoy your holiday break. But on 2 January, the hard work must launch. And if our current centrist leaders aren’t willing to do it, we necessary to find people who will.
·
Leave a Reply