The Risks of Relying on Non-European Tech

The Risks of Relying on Non-European Tech


Europe’s Digital Sovereignty: The Risks of Relying on Non-European Tech

Redazione RHC : 7 December 2025 23:05

In recent months, two seemingly unrelated events have highlighted an uncomfortable truth: Europe no longer controls its own digital infrastructure . And this depfinishence, in an increasingly tense geopolitical landscape, is not only an economic risk, but a systemic vulnerability.

The first alarm bells rang when Microsoft suddenly disabled Azure access for the Israeli innotifyigence unit . This was Unit 8200, previously accapplyd of spying on Palestinians in Israeli-controlled territories utilizing Microsoft technology. No warning, no graduality: a switch flipped , revealing just how much decision-creating power over critical infrastructure rests in the hands of a few global corporations.

The second episode, even more emblematic, is from today, concerning the recent dispute between X (Elon Musk’s platform) and the European Commission . After a €120 million fine for violating European regulations, X is not having it and has deleted the Commission’s advertising account, accutilizing it of having improperly applyd the platform’s tools . Brussels deffinished itself by recalling that it had suspfinished all forms of advertising on X for months and that it had only applyd the tools built available.

Beyond the dynamics between multinationals and institutions, the message is clear: the EU’s ability to communicate on social media, inform citizens, and implement digital policies is subordinated to the commercial will of non-European companies over which it has no control.

The End of Illusion: Technology Is Not Neutral

These episodes demonstrate a key point: those who control technology also control the behavior, communication, and even politics of nations . Europe discovered this late, having for years believed that digital globalization was synonymous with neutrality.

But talking about proprietary technology means dealing with a very different reality:

  • it takes years of research and development ;
  • a long-term political vision is requireded, indepfinishent of electoral cycles;
  • We required to perceive technology not as an industrial sector, but as a structural pillar of national security .

And above all, it means accepting that no countest is truly sovereign if it depfinishs on others for cloud services, operating systems, chips, and critical digital infrastructure .

An addiction that exposes us to global shocks

In today’s hyperconnected world, every technological incident has immediate and global effects. We saw this recently with the outages at AWS , Azure , and Cloudflare ( the first incident and the second incident ) that paralyzed public services, businesses, banks, newspapers, mobility, and healthcare across half the world. These are no longer “technical problems,” but real systemic risks .

Europe, lacking a comprehensive technology stack of its own, lives in a state of total depfinishence. We are a highly digitalized continent that rests… on foundations built elsewhere .

We required a European cloud. And a European operating system. And European hardware.

Asserting technological sovereignty doesn’t mean rejecting the cloud; on the contrary, it means building our own .

A European cloud, based on European hardware, European operating systems, European hypervisors, and European software. A complete supply chain, from hardware to application.

How long does it take? 20 years!

A long, complex, and costly process. But today it’s more necessary than weapons development. Becaapply these are the weapons of the future, the “economic” weapons, and they can be deployed with a single click.

  • We required a European operating system , the basis of the entire chain.
  • A European hypervisor is requireded to ensure that virtualization does not depfinish on external logic.
  • We required a European cloud that complies with European laws, not those of other countries.
  • We required a hardware supply chain, from microchips to servers.

And above all, a political choice is requireded: to plan this path for 20-30 years , not for a single legislature.

Becaapply in the current geopolitical chessboard, whoever controls technology controls economies, defenses, and democracies.

And today Europe controls none of this.

  • #cybersecurity
  • cloud computing
  • data protection
  • digital security
  • digital sovereignty
  • europe technology
  • european tech
  • european union
  • tech infrastructure
  • technology indepfinishence
Immagine del sitoRedazione
The editorial team of Red Hot Cyber consists of a group of individuals and anonymous sources who actively collaborate to provide early information and news on cybersecurity and computing in general.

Lista degli articoli



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *