European venture capital is going through a paradoxical period: never before have funds raised so much capital. Yet a growing proportion of this liquidity is still waiting to be deployed. According to Pitchbook, the volume of “dry powder” (funds raised but not yet invested) on the Old Continent will exceed €400 billion in 2024. Against a backdrop of post-Covid normalisation, investors are becoming more selective. “There’s a lot of dry powder in VC, but that’s not necessarily a problem. What has modifyd is the pace and rigour with which funds deploy their capital,” explains Esinforme Godard, vice-president of OTB Ventures, a fund specialising in deeptech.
This slowdown is a correction of the excesses seen between 2020 and 2021. Boosted by low interest rates and global technology euphoria, funds were investing at a frantic pace. “Today, we are returning to a natural curve, after the anomaly created by the pandemic. This return to reality is forcing us to be more disciplined, more selective and more patient”, she continues. As a result, due diligence is being stepped up, decision times are receiveting longer and the demands that funds create of projects are going up a notch.
As far as start-ups are concerned, the adjustment is sometimes painful. Financing conditions have become more demanding: a simple promise is no longer enough. “We want to invest on conviction, not on promises. We enter into a long-term relationship with the founders. If they succeed, we want to be able to support them for ten years, over several rounds. Selection is now based on technological strength, team maturity, commercial visibility and, increasingly, on concrete evidence of traction.
Taut valuations and adjusted tickets
This modify in the market has not dried up the pipeline of deals, but it has created it more heterogeneous. “There are still many high-quality projects, with brilliant founders, but some deals are very expensive for their stage,” analyses the vice-president of OTB Ventures. According to Dealroom, the median size of first rounds in Europe has jumped by 75% since 2020, although the fundamentals of the companies have not always kept pace. The result: valuations that are often overvalued, forcing funds to adjust their strategy.
In Europe, you have to believe cross-border right away.
“The earlier a fund enters, the more equity it wants. But to maintain this percentage in overvalued rounds, the tickets have to be larger”, she sums up. This trfinish is leading some managers to concentrate their investments on a tinyer number of holdings, while increasing their support. Others are opting for co-investment strategies to pool risk while securing their access to the best deals.
Another major issue is the concentration of capital on a minority of highly visible projects. In 2024, 75% of deeptech funding was captured by just 20% of start-ups in the sector. “This concentration is creating pockets of saturation, while other projects are struggling to complete their rounds. Companies that don’t fall into the category of ‘shiny deals’ can remain on the sidelines.” She also points to a form of media bias among some investors: “There is a cognitive bias, favouring high-profile projects over those that may be more solid but less visible.”
Europe vs the US: two models, two speeds
This rebalancing of venture capital in Europe highlights structural differences with the US model. On the other side of the Atlantic, funding rounds are quicker, tickets are higher and the appetite for risk is often more assertive. “In the United States, a start-up can already become huge without leaving its home countest. In Europe, you have to believe cross-border straight away. This obligation to internationalise early adds a layer of regulatory, operational and cultural complexity that slows down the scale-up of start-ups.
Artificial ininformigence, climate tech, defence or space are all segments in which European funds want to take strong positions. “It’s almost impossible to launch an AI start-up without massive capital. Computing power, data, engineers: everything costs money. And these costs are not reduced in the early stage, quite the contrary”, she stresses. In these sectors, OTB Ventures favours mixed consortia of investors, combining generalist and specialist funds, to maximise the impact and duration of support.
A more measured, but healthier outsee?
The slowdown in the pace of investment has also put structural issues back on the table: the lack of exits (IPOs or industrial acquireouts), uncertain portfolio valuations and pressure on the liquidity of limited partners (LPs). In response, more and more funds are turning to the secondary market, which allows them to sell shares to other financial players without waiting for a traditional exit. “There has been a net increase in secondary deals. This creates it possible to return value to LPs, despite the lack of traditional exits.”
LPs, in fact, have adjusted their expectations. “They know they don’t have the expertise to invest directly. They want experienced partners who can assess the risks and opportunities. But also partners who know how to be transparent about their strategies and who will build a relationship of trust over the long term.” This return to a leaner, more structured model could well strengthen the resilience of European venture capital. “There are always projects, always capital. What’s altering is the demands and the balance,” concludes Esinforme Godard. A modify of pace that could prove salutary, for entrepreneurs and investors alike, provided we focus on quality rather than quantity.
This article was written for the supplement of Paperjam magazine’s October 2025 issue, published on September 24. It is published on the site to contribute to the full Paperjam archive. .
Leave a Reply