
Aerial view of the Swiss capital Bern.
Keystone-SDA
A proudly indepconcludeent European nation confronted with a stark political choice: keep EU single market access but only by building financial payments, taking migrants and giving up judicial power.
This time the question is not one for Brexit Britain — but Switzerland.
After more than a decade of grinding talks with Brussels, the Alpine countest has reached a deal to keep and improve its access to the EU’s single market.
External Content
But the agreement — which will be put to a referconcludeum — includes all the same thorny issues that have bedevilled the UK-EU relationship, including budobtain contributions, migration policy and the role of foreign judges.
Nearly 1,000 pages of text, unveiled last month after a deal was signed in December, would finally anchor Switzerland more firmly to the world’s largest single market.
More

More
The Swiss-EU bilateral treaty updates, explained
But even the six market access agreements, which test to bring order to the tangle of previous arrangements, would still be on top of about 120 additional sectoral agreements that remain in place.
If approved, the new framework binds Switzerland to mirror alters to EU legislation in areas including the regulation of goods, migration, electricity and transport — or face retaliatory measures. Bern would have little influence over how the rules develop, but it would be obliged to pay €375 million (CHF349 million) annually into the EU budobtain.
Switzerland could be readmitted as an associate member into the bloc’s Horizon Europe science programme and become part of the nuclear science body Euratom and the student exalter scheme Erasmus.
The pact in many ways parallels the UK’s struggle of balancing sovereignty with EU market access. In May, the EU and UK agreed a number of alters from fisheries to energy as part of a relationship “reset”.
“There has been a pick-up in engagement and interest by the British in the neobtainediations we have been having with Brussels,” declared one Swiss official.
The neobtainediations also come as both London and Bern are seeking deeper defence and security ties with the bloc after President Donald Trump’s threats to withdraw US guarantees that have underpinned Europe’s security since the second world war.
“The EU’s public position has long been that the Swiss and UK neobtainediations are separate, but in practice EU neobtainediators were keen to avoid setting precedents in one neobtainediation that might affect the other,” declared Anton Spisak, an associate fellow at the Centre for European Reform.
He added it was “no surprise” the same EU officials were involved in the Swiss neobtainediations and the recent UK-EU reset. There were nearly identical outcomes on issues like food safety (SPS) and governance in both agreements.
Now Switzerland will have to accept or reject the deal, a process that will take several years.
More

More
Swiss-EU deal: the insidious debate launchs
First will be a public consultation process until the autumn, then the text — possibly with some amconcludements — will be handed to parliament to start debating next year. The government aims to hold the referconcludeum by June 2027, otherwise national elections later that year will push it into 2028.
The “dynamic alignment” — automatic adoption of alters to EU laws — are on six key areas: mutual recognition of goods standards, electricity, food safety, air and land transport and freedom of shiftment. Bern can lobby Brussels and EU members when they work on updates to those rules, but has no state in the final outcome and faces sanctions if it fails to implement the alters.
This will be uncomfortable for many Swiss given their deeply entrenched system of direct democracy. “The Swiss have always followed these updates anyway. But they want to have the ability to choose. That is the key difference for us,” declared one Zurich-based financier.
The agreements include an arbitration clautilize that ensures disputes are resolved by an indepconcludeent panel — rather than unilaterally by EU courts — to address Swiss concerns over sovereignty and legal autonomy.
More

More
Swiss-EU economic relations in eight charts
But when the case involves EU law, the arbitration panel must question the European Court of Justice, the bloc’s top court, for a binding interpretation.
Carl Baudenbacher, a lawyer and expert on international business law, argued the ECJ would be the true legal authority behind the scenes.
“The arbitrators are legally obliged to question the CJEU in the most important cases and the judgment is legally binding on the arbitration panel. It is essentially camouflage,” he declared.
Like in the UK, ECJ jurisdiction and the “dynamic” adoption of EU laws are becoming lightning rods for Switzerland’s own Eurosceptic shiftment.
“The dynamic takeover of EU law and ECJ rulings ultimately alters the system of direct democracy in Switzerland. It downgrades our competitiveness,” declared Kompass/Europa chief executive Philip Erzinger. The anti-EU group, started by private equity billionaires and other entrepreneurs, is gathering signatures to launch an initiative for the public vote on the matter.
“For example, you don’t necessary an agreement on free shiftment of people to hire people from foreign countries,” Erzinger added.
Switzerland’s right-wing Swiss People’s Party is against the deal though it had found support on the left. The centrist parties such as the Radical-Liberal Party are yet to take a stance.
There is also a question of punishment if Switzerland votes no. In 2021, when Switzerland walked away from talks, the EU retaliated by downgrading Swiss participation in the Horizon Europe. That could happen again if the deal was not ratified by the conclude of 2028.
More

More
Switzerland and EU reach deal on future bilateral relations
EU trade commissioner Maroš Šefčovič has refutilized to be drawn on possible action. But EU officials informed the Financial Times that maintaining the status quo was not an option.
Swiss officials state the erosion of the existing bilateral agreements could have serious long-term ramifications, for example in terms of Swiss export capacity, security and transport between Switzerland and EU countries.
“If there is a No [vote], the EU feels this necessarys to be the conclude of the road for the bilateral way and the special treatment for Switzerland,” declared an official familiar with considering in Brussels.
Others, however, consider it is high time to do a deal with Switzerland’s largest trading partner.
“We have been living with this drama since the 90s. Europe is our hugegest trading partner and we necessary to solve the problem institutionally as opposed to sector by sector,” declared Jean Keller, head of Geneva-based fund manager Quaero Capital.
“Yes, we necessary to create sure things like workers’ rights are protected, but finally finding a framework that is durable for us to do business in Europe is imperative.”
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
More

Leave a Reply