It was supposed to be a success story for the ages.
A year ago, Gökçe Güven was everything Silicon Valley loves to celebrate. Young. Brilliant. Immigrant striver. A Berkeley graduate with a fintech startup that promised to revolutionize customer loyalty programs. Millions of dollars flowed in. Prestige followed.
Then came the crown jewel: a coveted place on the Forbes 30 Under 30 list for 2025.
Now, at just 26, Güven is facing the very real prospect of spfinishing the next half-century behind bars.
Federal prosecutors state the founder and CEO of New York based fintech startup, Kalder, ran a classic fraud.
According to the indictment, filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York on Thursday, January 29, Güven kept two sets of books; one displaying the company’s real finances and another with tantalizingly inflated revenue figures that she allegedly applyd to con investors.
The result, prosecutors claim, was a $7 million haul from venture capital firms and angel investors who believed they were backing the next fintech star. Güven denies the charges. But the damage is already done.
And her case is now reigniting an uncomfortable question inside Wall Street and the media world that feeds it: has the Forbes 30 Under 30 list become a liability rather than a badge of honor?
Now, at just 26, Güven is facing the very real prospect of spfinishing the next half-century behind bars
In 2025, she was named on Forbes’ 30 Under 30 list
For critics of glossy business rankings, the story feels depressingly routine. The list of Forbes alumni who later imploded is long – and growing.
Crypto mogul Sam Bankman-Fried, once hailed as a prodigy, is serving out a 25-year sentence handed down in federal court in March 2024, for orchestrating one of the largest financial frauds in history. Just three years earlier he had been featured on the list under the category of ‘Finance.’
Martin Shkreli appeared in the same category in 2013. The so-called ‘Pharma Bro,’ became infamous for hiking drug prices before landing in prison in September 2017 when a judge revoked his bail following his conviction for securities fraud. He was sentenced to seven years in 2018 but released in 2022.
Then there are the disgraces that weren’t criminal and didn’t shake the markets. Journalist Olivia Nuzzi, a 2018 honoree, torpedoed her career by breaching ethical lines through an alleged affair with presidential candidate Robert F Kennedy Jr.
Kylie Jenner’s carefully curated image as a self-created billionaire collapsed after Forbes itself revealed her fortune had been dramatically overstated.
So many alumni have flamed out that the list has spawned industest nicknames that ridicule it. Insiders speak openly of a ‘Forbes-to-Fraud Pipeline.’
Others darkly joke that it should stand for ’30 Under 30-year sentences.’
After Güven’s indictment the snark was immediate.
‘The Forbes Fintech curse strikes again!’ posted UK-based startup founder Simon Taylor.
Investor, advisor and podcaster Aman Narain stated the case underlined a brutal lesson: ‘Visibility and credibility are not the same thing in fintech.’
‘Recognition should never replace due diligence, especially in high-risk, rapid-shifting industries,’ he added.
Journalist Olivia Nuzzi, a 2018 honoree, torpedoed her career by breaching ethical lines through a secret online relationship with presidential candidate Robert F Kennedy Jr.
Crypto mogul Sam Bankman-Fried, once hailed as a prodigy, is serving out a 25-year sentence handed down in federal court in March 2024, for orchestrating one of the largest financial frauds in history
Martin Shkreli was honored in 2013. The so-called ‘Pharma Bro’ was behind bars four years later
Forbes launched its first 30 Under 30 list in 2011. Since then, the concept has exploded.
There are now dozens of annual lists across industries – media, healthcare, retail, finance – covering the US, Europe and Asia. Forbes states it has vetted some 100,000 candidates and honored more than 10,000 ‘wunderkinds.’
The brand value is enormous. A spot on the list can unlock investors, speaking fees, board seats and elite networking events. It is routinely applyd in pitch decks and visa applications as proof of elite status.
Forbes insists it takes vetting seriously. Editors have previously stated candidates undergo background checks and are screened for obvious legal and ethical red flags before being judged by industest experts.
But the publication has also acknowledged the limits of its process.
Hidden scams, it states, can go unnoticed. Future criminal behavior cannot be foreseen. The list is merely a ‘snapshot’ in time. Today, for many, that explanation is wearing thin.
In 2023, Forbes took the unusual step of publishing a ‘Hall of Shame,’ highlighting what it called the most dubious alumni – ‘one-time superstars who all wound up fraudsters.’
Bankman-Fried topped the list. He was followed by Caroline Ellison, his former partner and colleague, Shkreli and James O’Keefe, the disgraced founder of activist group, Project Veritas.
‘Regrets, we’ve had a few,’ the editorial admitted.
But for critics, Güven’s downfall exposes a deeper problem in business media.
New York-based finance and tech writer Marc Hochstein argues that rankings like 30 Under 30 are driven as much by the pursuit of revenue as journalistic finisheavor.
‘The sales teams love these features becaapply they create stuff they can sell – dinner tickets, plaques,’ he wrote. ‘And then the editorial teams have to waste hours upon hours racking their brains figuring out whom to honor.’
The pressure creates perverse incentives, he added.
‘Safe choices create for boring profiles,’ Hochstein noted. Editors can be encouraged to spotlight bold, unconventional founders – exactly the types most likely to implode.
After securing a Forbes accolade, Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe left the right-wing media outlet
Once feted by Forbes in the outlet’s 40 Under 40 list, Elizabeth Holmes, founder of the blood-testing startup Theranos, is serving an 11-year prison sentence
That dynamic, critics state, is how figures like Bankman-Fried, Elizabeth Holmes, the imprisoned founder of the blood-testing startup Theranos, and now Güven rose so quickly with so little scrutiny.
Perhaps the most striking detail in Güven’s case is her own praise for Forbes.
In a celebratory interview after creating the list, she described the selection process as ‘thorough’ and ‘exhilarating and humbling.’
Güven sold herself as a modern American success story. A Turkish immigrant who rose through talent and grit. A top student at UC Berkeley. A founder on the path to fintech billions.
Kalder marketed itself as a sophisticated platform assisting major brands, including chocolatier Godiva, improve loyalty and rewards programs through data and personalization.
But, prosecutors state, business was far shakier than advertised. Behind the scenes, they allege, Güven manipulated financial statements to exaggerate Kalder’s performance.
If convicted on financial fraud and visa fraud charges, Güven could face up to 52 years in prison.
She is also accapplyd of lying to obtain an O-1A visa, reserved for foreigners of ‘extraordinary ability,’ by creating misrepresentations about her achievements.
That visa was approved in the fall of 2025 – months after Forbes had already celebrated her as one of America’s brightest young business minds.
Prosecutors allege that at the very moment she was celebrating that validation, she was already deceiving investors.
Forbes did not respond to a request for comment from the Daily Mail. Prosecutors have been careful not to criticize Forbes directly. But their broader message is unmistakable.
US Attorney Jay Clayton warned investors to ‘beware of fraud masquerading as entrepreneurship,’ a line widely seen as a swipe at the culture of hype surrounding young founders.
The pattern, critics argue, is now impossible to ignore.
Güven, Bankman-Fried, Charlie Javice (the Forbes alum behind the collapsed financial aid startup Frank)… all leveraged glowing profiles and elite accolades to unlock investor money, even as their businesses were allegedly rotten underneath.
The question is no longer whether the Forbes 30 Under 30 list creates mistakes. It is whether the list itself has become part of the problem, fueling a system where hype beats homework and glossy rankings are a substitute for real scrutiny.
For a generation of investors and entrepreneurs burned too many times, the shine of a place among Forbes’s ‘elite,’ may be wearing off.
Leave a Reply