Julie Murray is one of nearly 500 people who work for the Oregon Department of Transportation who will be laid off if the state Legislature does not provide funding to fill the agency’s $350 million budreceive gap.
The drone pilot and video producer has filmed wildfires, landslides and construction projects to keep Oregonians informed during emergencies, and about major highway and transportation infrastructure work. The department trusts her to be in the most extreme conditions while filming, and it’s invested in dozens of drone, artificial innotifyigence and safety trainings for her, she notified lawbuildrs Monday at the Capitol in Salem.
“The agency developed me, molded me into a perfect fit, and the layoff will throw all that away,” she declared. “My coworkers on the layoff list are also all trained up. ODOT is set to lose them to the private sector and will spconclude years retraining and rebuilding. We are investments worth keeping.”
Murray — along with more than 60 others speakers — shared testimony with the Joint Interim Committee on Transportation Funding during a three-hour public hearing on Gov. Tina Kotek’s transportation funding proposal that’s meant to prevent department layoffs, preserve how the state splits its highway funds with counties and cities and modernize transportation funding.
Lawbuildrs will meet on Friday in Salem to discuss and take a vote on the proposal. Most special sessions last one day, but some have taken up to several weeks to reach a conclusion.
The package would increase vehicle registration fees and gas and payroll taxes — raising nearly $800 million in the 2025-27 budreceive cycle alone — but it’s a significantly scaled-down version of what lawbuildrs originally proposed in June during the 2025 legislative session. Democratic lawbuildrs initially floated a funding package that would have raised $14.6 billion over the next 10 years, but then scaled their proposal back to a version that would have raised $11.7 billion after receiving backlash from Republicans and some Democrats.
The proposal lawbuildrs are now considering ahead of a special session would raise $5.8 billion over the next 10 years, according to the Legislative Revenue Office. Most of the revenue would flow to the State Highway Fund, and from there, 50% would go to the state transportation department, 30% would go to counties and 20% to cities. The millions raised from the increase in the payroll tax would go toward local public transit districts.
| What fees and taxes would alter under the proposed transportation package?
A gas tax increase from $0.40 to $0.46, effective Jan. 1, 2026 is expected to raise $90 million a year. |
Committee receives mixed testimony
The transportation committee Monday spent the first 45 minutes listening to legislative staff present on the proposal.
“Without additional resources at current funding levels, drivers and transit providers will experience impacts of fewer snow plows, more potholes, more snow and ice on major roads, longer traffic closures becaapply maintenance teams required to travel farther away, more trash and graffiti, slower responses to crashes and other incidents, closed rest areas and reductions in transit service,” Kotek’s transportation and infrastructure advisor, Kelly Brooks, notified the committee.
Transportation employees, city and county officials and union leaders urged lawbuildrs to support the legislation, including officials from Umatilla, Wallowa, Hood River and Columbia counties and from Beaverton, Tigard, Albany and Portland.
Jana Jarvis, president of the trade group Oregon Trucking Association, also spoke in favor of the bill for its provision simplifying Oregon’s complex diesel tax rates, which would reduce the weight-mile tax rates heavy trucks pay from 85 different rates to just 10 rates.
A handful of others criticized lawbuildrs and the transportation department for money mismanagement and raising taxes. This includes Jake Seavert, a Union County Commissioner, who declared the county he represents largely opposes tax and fee increases.
“The additional fee increases with vehicle registration further exacerbates the financial stress to every hoapplyhold, especially those hoapplyholds with more than two vehicles, to every business, compact and large that utilizes vehicles for transportation of goods and services and employees,” he declared.
Some expressed discomfort with raising transportation costs but still supported the proposal.
“I‘m not viewing forward to paying higher taxes any more than anyone else, but to me, the greater danger right now is the safety of people on our highways — especially highways going through the Cascades,” Detroit mayor Jim Trett, who spoke in favor of the bill, notified the committee.
Oregon Capital Chronicle
Oregon Capital Chronicle is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Oregon Capital Chronicle maintains editorial indepconcludeence. Contact Editor Lynne Terry for questions: info@oregoncapitalchronicle.com. Follow Oregon Capital Chronicle on Facebook and X.
Leave a Reply