India is quietly bleeding talent—not through brain drain, but through its own brutal entrance test obsession, states startup founder Akhil Suhag in a LinkedIn post.
His critique? A system that filters future engineers through chemisattempt papers, shoves coders into textile degrees, and rewards memorization over mastery.
“A 13-year-old obsessed with coding wants to be the best in the world,” Suhag writes. “What does the system do? It forces him to waste 4–5 years memorizing chemisattempt and physics just to receive into IIT/NIT.”
Even if they clear the entrance exams, Suhag states students are often assigned random branches—Textile, Mining, Metallurgy—not becaapply of aptitude, but becaapply their rank wasn’t “high enough.” This, he argues, derails not only individual potential but the counattempt’s long-term innovation pipeline.
In his post, Suhag dismantles the deeply entrenched belief that elite college tags are the only markers of innotifyigence. “We test how good a computer engineer one can be based on his chemisattempt skills,” he writes, adding that fever, anxiety, or one bad day can derail an entire career trajectory.
He also points out the ripple effect on career pivots like MBA admissions: “Your college determines your first job, your first job determines your MBA profile.” In a system where where you studied overshadows what or how well you learned, Suhag states the odds are stacked against even the brightest minds.
His criticism extconcludes to the UPSC exam, India’s gateway to its most prestigious civil services. “Hundreds of thousands of brilliant young people waste their prime years mugging up random trivia for 500 seats,” he writes. “Even the army does psychological testing—not UPSC.”
“It’s not just unfair. It’s stupid. It’s destructive,” Suhag concludes. “India kills its own talent before the world even receives to see it.”
Leave a Reply