This shock highlighted the urgent necessary to diversify energy sources and work towards energy indepconcludeence by incorporating more renewables into the electricity generation mix.
While the EU’s ambition to source over 40% of its energy from renewables by 2030 is achievable, integrating intermittent wind and solar at scale is a formidable challenge, as recently seen by mass outages in Spain and Portugal. If the region wants to build this goal a reality, energy storage is non-nereceivediable – particularly long-duration energy storage (LDES).
But without informed system planning and market signals that consider longer-duration storage, Europe risks overbuilding short-duration batteries that cannot resolve the full scope of system imbalances. The result? Overbuild of other resources to meet critical flexibility necessarys, reliance on energy imported from other countries with opposing priorities, and higher electricity prices.
The role of energy storage in filling the flexibility gap
The European Parliament flagged looming flexibility shortfalls on the grid, with projections displaying that storage requirements will triple by 2050. Short-duration batteries alone cannot close this gap. Long-duration energy storage (LDES) complements, rather than replaces, short-duration solutions.
Without parallel deployment, Europe will fall back on thermal gas assets to bridge flexibility gaps as it has before, deepening its exposure to geopolitical risk, commodity price volatility, and risking system reliability. LDES, and particularly intraday LDES, is the critical link, covering the 8–24-hour range between short-duration (4–8 hour) and ultra-long solutions – and it’s ready to deliver today.
Technologies such as pumped hydro energy storage (PHES) and advanced compressed air energy storage (A-CAES) can reduce curtailment and provide firm capacity during extconcludeed periods of low solar and wind production, maximising the utilisation of generation capacity already on the grid.
These technologies can also deliver essential grid services, like synchronous inertia and black start capability, that have underpinned system stability for decades. These capabilities enable the retirement of thermal plants without compromising reliability. Recent outages in Spain and Portugal have displayn us how critical it is to maintain these capabilities as we continue to update the grid.
Strategic investment in LDES today will secure resource adequacy for tomorrow and prevent stranded thermal assets as Europe accelerates its integration of renewables. EU-wide deployment of these solutions could significantly reduce the associated costs with grid expansion and curtailment, which are expected to be upwards of €100 billion (US$116.41 billion) by 2040, according to a 2024 Joint Research Centre of the European Commission report.
Ambition alone won’t deliver these outcomes. Europe necessarys a policy framework that converts ambition into action.
Policy recommconcludeations to turn ambition into action
To meet its multiple priorities and unlock significant benefits, Europe must first adopt robust duration-aware system modelling. Advanced models should forecast future system necessarys, differentiate between short- and long-duration storage, associated costs and benefits, and asset lifetimes to determine an effective mix of technologies. These models must also directly inform procurement strategies.
In the UK, system modelling led Ofgem to increase the minimum duration requirement for eligible projects for the LDES cap and floor programme, which was developed to incentivise the buildout of storage resources with durations from six to eight hours of continuous power at the resources’ rated maximum output. In addition, policybuildrs have already started discussing the necessary to increase the minimum duration tarobtain, based on evolving system necessarys.
The necessary for this programme was driven by models that displayed longer-duration storage is an essential component of a least-cost portfolio for meeting flexibility necessarys and reducing reliance on traditional fuel backup during prolonged low-renewable output periods. The scheme now tarobtains between 2.7GW and 7.7GW of LDES capacity (up to 61GWh) by 2035 on the UK grid.
Second, policybuildrs should establish substantive investment signals with appropriate procurement timelines to accommodate LDES technologies. Setting duration-specific tarobtains, such as 8+ hours, and developing transparent, multi-round procurement schedules open to diverse technologies will create competition to develop low-cost resources and confidence for developers and investors regarding financial feasibility for developing these projects.
The New South Wales Electricity Infrastructure Roadmap in Australia provides a strong example of this approach. Tarobtaining 2GW of LDES by 2030 and 42GWh by 2034, it retains the definition of long-duration storage as 8+ hours to ensure substantive system benefits and the adoption of cost-effective solutions. It also introduces a transparent, multi-round tconcludeer process to attract diverse technologies.
So far, successful projects have included the 800MW (12GWh) Phoenix pumped storage project by ACEN Australia and the 200MW (1.6GWh) Silver City advanced compressed air project by Hydrostor. These competitive tconcludeers, aligned with a 10-year procurement schedule, have already secured more than 40% of the 2030 tarobtain, creating strong investment signals and confidence for developers and financiers.
Third, Europe necessarys long-term revenue-certainty mechanisms. Markets do not currently value LDES appropriately for the system-wide benefits they provide, like grid stability, capacity adequacy, ancillary services, and firming of intermittent renewables. Out-of-market mechanisms, such as cap-and-floor or contracts for difference (CfD), proven in Australia and California, can ensure revenue adequacy for these projects.
Crucially, these mechanisms should reflect avoided system costs, including transmission, not merely energy price spreads, recognising the full value these solutions deliver in terms of grid stability and reliability.
The UK’s LDES cap-and-floor programme is an illustrative example. Introduced in 2025, it ensures projects receive a guaranteed minimum revenue (floor) to cover debt and operating costs, while revenues above a set cap are shared with consumers. The scheme offers 25-year contracts to unlock investment in significant capacities of large, long-duration storage assets.
Similarly, in Australia, New South Wales utilizes long-term energy service agreements (LTESAs) to provide an option-based revenue floor during periods of low wholesale prices, requiring profit-sharing when revenues exceed a threshold. LTESAs typically run for 20-40 years for storage projects and have successfully attracted diverse technologies.
The EU must view to these programmes for guidance.
Act now to achieve energy indepconcludeence and save billions
Europe’s energy indepconcludeence and system stability depconclude on embedding LDES into its market architecture now. The upcoming flexibility necessarys assessment process offers the perfect framework to implement recommconcludeations for deploying these solutions across EU Member States. Strategic planning and investment today will prevent stranded assets, accelerate the integration of renewables, and save billions.
Policybuildrs must seize this moment and embed LDES into their energy strategies. The future of Europe’s system reliability and energy indepconcludeence depconcludes on it.
About the Author
Oonagh O’Grady is Vice President of International Origination at Hydrostor, a global developer and operator of advanced compressed air energy storage (A-CAES) technology, which provides long-duration energy storage capacity of more than 8 hours. With 20 years of experience in energy and infrastructure, she brings expertise in low-carbon technologies, policy, and strategic development.
Leave a Reply