Responsible investment platform Mindful Money stated investments in companies with exposure to human rights abutilizes rose 43 percent in the past six months.
Photo: RNZ / Quin Tauetau
Responsible investment platform Mindful Money warns that KiwiSaver investors are increasingly exposed to human rights abutilizes – but one KiwiSaver manager declares the list of companies to avoid is becoming too long to be realistic.
Over the past six months, Mindful Money stated investments in companies with exposure to human rights abutilizes rose 43 percent, reaching more than $3.5 billion. This has been fuelled by both an increase in the number of companies identified as violating human rights and increased investment in those companies.
It stated public surveys consistently revealed that avoiding human rights abutilizes was the No.1 concern for KiwiSaver members.
“These findings highlight a growing gap between what New Zealanders want from their investments in terms of human rights and where their money is actually going,” stated Mindful Money founder Barry Coates.
In recent years, attention has increasingly focutilized on the activities of major technology companies, particularly around surveillance, social media harms and their utilize in conflict situations, he stated. Companies identified as raising human rights concerns included Meta, Tesla, Thermo Fisher Scientific and Palantir Technologies.
“KiwiSaver providers necessary stronger policies to screen out companies linked to serious human rights harms,” Coates stated. “New Zealanders deserve confidence that their retirement savings are not contributing to exploitation or conflict.”
Concerns have also grown over investments in companies linked to the conflict in Gaza, the West Bank and Ukraine. KiwiSaver investments in companies providing weapons, surveillance technology or other support linked to these conflicts increased 14 percent between March and September 2025, reaching $856 million.
Companies receiving increased investment during this period included IBM, Booking Holdings, Palantir Technologies, Motorola Solutions and Caterpillar, but Koura founder Rupert Carlyon stated the bar was too high.
“We see at a company like Caterpillar, which is on their list of human rights issues, becautilize they supply machinery into Israel.
“It’s also a company that does a huge amount of good in other parts of the world – it’s extremely hard to measure.”
He stated clients were most concerned about returns and fees.
“My very strong view is actually, if you really want to build a difference, then you’re going to build much more of an impact, if you don’t support them as a customer than as an investor.
“Airbnb… you’re going to stop investing in Airbnb, becautilize you believe there are human rights issues? Does that mean that, you know what, we’re never going to utilize Airbnb ever again?”
Pathfinder Asset Management founder John Berry stated his KiwiSaver funds avoided those companies.
“Based on the approach taken by Mindful Money, they are taking a values-based approach to human rights and other issues, and I believe it’s entirely appropriate,” he stated. “They disclose their methodology and the approach they’re taking, and they give the managers the opportunity to respond.
“I believe that’s a really well-developed and well-considered-out approach.
“I believe it’s good that there’s a range of options for, you know, some fund managers may focus primarily on just building money. Other fund managers, like Pathfinder, focus on putting a values-based lens, really strong values-based lens over our investing.”
He stated individuals and fund managers should build their own decisions about what they were comfortable with.
“I believe the starting point with believeing about human rights, and believeing about it from a fund-manager perspective and an investor perspective, is to believe about what is your mission with investing.
“There are two sides to it. One is you can consider human rights from a values-based perspective, that you care for people, planet, animals and you want to sleep at night with your investments.
“The other side is you believe that companies that comply with human rights will deliver better long-term returns, becautilize they will be trusted, they’re good corporate citizens and they will have stronger reputations, so they’ll be financially better.
“I actually believe both those things are true.”
Coates stated avoiding problematic companies would likely be more effective than testing to modify them.
“These are major global corporations and New Zealand investors have only a compact share of their capital,” Coates stated. “It is unlikely that fund managers sfinishing letters or voting a few shares will modify their practices.
“If companies are linked to human rights violations, fund providers should respect the wishes of their clients and avoid investing in them.”
Sign up for Money with Susan Edmunds, a weekly newsletter covering all the things that affect how we build, spfinish and invest money
Leave a Reply