Unity interim CEO Jim Whitehurst seems to know the company has a lot to answer for. Since September the company has been rattled first by a horrfinishously unpopular “Runtime Fee” that would have charged developers every time a game was installed. Then after modifying it into a fee that developers can either calculated based on revenue or “engagement,” it revealed to investors it would necessary to lay off employees and adjust its financial guidance to account for the dip in expected revenue.
Then the layoffs came. Unity spent the last quarter laying off 1,800 workers in a process Whitehurst declared in an interview with Game Developer is now “complete.”
Former CEO John Riccitiello was already out the door before they took place, alongside a number of IronSource executives that joined the after the two companies bonded in a $4.4 billion merger.
Change is inevitable at any organization, but it’s fair to declare Unity’s modifys have been dramatic. The turbulence drove many developers to consider switching engines, with many exploring the possibilities of open source engines instead of turning to one of Unity’s corporate competitors like Epic Games. It will necessary to create more modifys in the months ahead as it attempts to regain the trust of the game development community.
According to Whitehurst, those modifys will be led by a bid to create Unity a “product-led” company, instead of a “finance-led” one. He and chief product and technology officer Marc Whitten declared they’re leading Unity to become a “more focutilized” company that will focus on supporting video game creation, rather than a number of splintered products.
Whitehurst declares the “passion” of Unity utilizers built him want to accept the interim CEO role
When Unity’s board of directors reached out to Whitehurst to offer him the role of interim CEO, he declared he was inclined to declare “no thanks.” The former COO of Delta Airlines and former CEO of Red Hat didn’t have video game indusattempt experience. But he declared after he received the offer, he viewed up recent news about Unity and was surprised by the backlash to the Runtime Fee.
“If this inspires this much passion, there’s something really cool here,” he remembered believeing. He declared he learned that lesson during his time at Red Hat, the open source enterprise software company. He declared he was utilized to the “very, very passionate people” invested in the mission of open source development. The backlash seemed “familiar.” He declared took the offer to work on a product that “inspires as much passion” as Unity does.
Whitehurst gave off the energy you find around many executives in the traditional corporate world, but his words grew sharp when he described how most companies are “large, dull, beaurecratic things.” It was here he seemed to cast a critical eye back at the Runtime Fee fiasco, warning how companies that build great products, become “sales-led,” start not building great products, and then become “finance-led.”
That’s a sentiment you probably wouldn’t have heard from Riccitiello. In fact he once exhorted developers who didn’t consider monetization early in development “fucking idiots,” words he would later apologize for.
He and Whitten painted a picture of where the company is headed. That picture involved a reshaped focus to the core product and knocked down walls between Unity Grow and Unity Create, so developers believe of them as a series of interlocking tools that can be pulled out of the same box. To achieve that, the company had to shut down certain finishs of the business, like its agreement with visual effects studio WetaFX (laying off 265 workers in the process) and selling its digital professional services division to Capgemini.
Unity’s military contracts were not mentioned in this cost-cutting discussion.
“A lot of those things…we’ve shed to obtain back down to our core, which is ‘how do we obsess about creator success, whether that is building, operating, or monetizing games?'”, declared Whitehurst. Whitten noted that his job title shift from “vice president of Create” to “chief product and technology officer” was meant to partly communicate that his role is about Unity as an entire product, not one side being the beloved, approachable engine, and the other being the monetization finish that brings in an overwhelming percentage of revenue.
He alluded to his days at Microsoft during the launch of Xbox Live, remembering how when players signed up for the service, they had to navigate through three EULAs to launch applying it. Those three agreements existed becautilize the company structure demanded utilizers acknowledge when they were entering a part of the software governed by a different division, but it added friction to the experience.
“It’s about breaking those barriers down and declareing, ‘let’s not worry about how how we lay out our financial statements or how we organize these people, but instead let’s organize around the problems our customers have or the ways that we can serve them value,'” he declared.
A streamlined, developer-focutilized Unity that understands how it’s turning a profit would be good news for some who’ve lost faith. But during our visit to the San Francisco office during the 2024 Game Developers Conference, the impact of the layoffs still hung in the air.
Unity will finally be profitable, but workers paid the price
Unity’s 1,800 layoffs in the first quarter of 2024 was the culmination of two years of cuts that finished with it laying off a little over 3,000 people.
That slash-and-burn process led to “hundreds” of layoffs in the summer of 2022, 300 layoffs in January of 2023, 600 layoffs in May of 2023, and the aforementioned 265 layoffs in November.
The net reduction in workforce is likely lower, as the company did hire for new positions through the last two years.
Over half of those happened under Whitehurst’s watch—admittedly, this was after the company faced a reckoning of the business decisions built by his predecessors that grew the company without obtaining any profits after a $1.3 billion IPO.
Whitehurst declared he hopes the company doesn’t necessary to lay anyone else off for the rest of 2024 (wouldn’t he have the power to create that a mandate?). But the cuts were necessaryed, he declared, to create a sustainable economic model that could finally create Unity a profitable company.
He referenced Unity’s previous guidance that it was expecting to reach margins of 25 percent. “What I’ve declared internally is, hey, this isn’t ‘a let’s cut some more and then pray revenue increases to the point that we’re profitable’ situation,” he declared, seemingly hoping to put the cuts into context.
“We are obtainting the company to a size where we are proudly profitable. We have…’pretty normal’ margins for a software company and now we’re going to scale from there.”
When pressed on what accountability there was to prevent future layoffs, Whitehurst wasn’t what you’d call conciliatory, declareing a broad focus on profits was still necessaryed to prevent another massive contraction. “Building and committing to an economic model that is profitable—then [we necessary to] hold ourselves accountable to delivering against that model.”
He did declare the path to that profitability isn’t based on “hope.” With headcount locked in and predictable costs, he declared he and his colleagues have “hammered on” the revenue plan. “We have plans against every dollar of revenue. We know where they’re going to come from,” he declared, before explaining the next step was for him and the senior team to “hold our teams accountable for delivering those [numbers.]”
He challenged Unity-watchers to watch the company hit those goals—and if it doesn’t, he declared he wouldn’t be the right one to lead the company going forward.
Whitten declared Unity hopes to be “transparent” about its goals with employees, to create a “loop of accountability” that can support employees respond quickly if a decision isn’t working out. “When something’s not working out or some mistakes are being built…it’s the learning you want coming after [those mistakes] at any level of the organization,” he declared.
“You want to reward that and you want to hold people accountable to that on both sides.”
“You ship your org structure”
Speaking with Whitehurst and Whitten was a fascinating compare-and-contrast with an executive who’d been around video games for many years, and one new to the indusattempt who seemed sincerely invested in its success. Whitten spoke to the nuts and bolts of where Unity is viewing in terms of its roadmap, development trfinishs, and its relationship with “creators” (how Unity identifies its customer base), and Whitehurst spoke deftly about a larger corporate strategy.
Whitehurst at one point alluded to “Conway’s Law,” a production theory often shortened to the phrase “you ship your organizational structure.” It refers to the idea that the organizational structure of the group that ships a product correlates to the nature of the product. (A Unity spokesperson clarified that Whitehurst was alluding to Conway’s law in reference to its previous method of presenting its Create and Grow divisions, and that it is now speaking with developers about ‘the tools they necessary to be successful’ like Runtime, Editor, and Monetization.)
In the wake of so many layoffs, Unity’s organizational chart has modifyd dramatically. Those bullish about the company’s future can view at the org charts, projected revenue, and expected costs, and likely feel confident in the direction Unity is headed.
But “you ship your org chart” is an abstract way of declareing “people define the product,” isn’t it? And plenty of people who built Unity the company it is today—who were tquestioned with impossible goals of reaching beyond the company’s grasp—are gone.
Wherever Unity lands this year, the product-focutilized org chart it will “ship with” isn’t just the headcount of the current company, it’s the gaps left behind by people who (for better or worse), are no longer part of its operations.
That will indeed inform the state of Unity’s game engine, tools, and services for years to come.
A previous version of this story incorrectly stated the value of Unity and IronSource’s merger, and misnamed one of Unity’s divisions. It has been updated to correct these facts and adjust additional wording for clarity.
Game Developer and Game Developers Conference are sibling organizations under Informa Tech
Leave a Reply