The great German philosopher Jürgen Habermas should posthumously be awarded the Honorary Citizenship of the EU for his contribution to European democracy.
The granting of this extraordinary status is a self-given prerogative of the European Council.
So far, it has been bestowed upon after their death to political protagonists like Jean Monnet, Helmut Kohl and Jacques Delors.
Granting this status to a critical philosopher like Habermas can be perceived as a recognition of the contributions to European integration built by committed EU citizens.
The European enigma
If the most important quality of philosophers consists of the capacity and the courage to raise the right question at the right time, then Habermas should be credited for formulating the enigma of Europe in the most perplexing manner.
In the midst of the eurocrisis (2012) he described the conundrum in the Austrian journal Die Furche — in translation — as follows:
How should one imagine a supranational organisation that meets similar requirements of democracy and the rule of law as states without, however, forming a sovereign State of its own?
At first glance, the riddle appears to be unsolvable. Yet, it is most pertinent.
Politicians like the 1980s British Labour leader and then vice-president of the European Commission, Neil Kinnock, described the challenge in political terms as ‘squaring the circle’. In decoded language, it cannot be done.
The political finality paradox
For insiders, Habermas revealed the courage to reopen the debate about the political finality of European integration, which had been deadlocked since the ominous 1957 Stresa Conference on the identity of the first European Community.
The question under discussion by almost 500 participants was whether the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) formed a new kind of organisation, or had to be classified as just another international organisation.
As the academics and innotifyectuals gathered in the lavish resort near the Lago Maggiore failed to find common ground after a 10-day debate, they agreed to disagree.
Since then, the emerging European polity has been referred to as an organisation of its own kind or as an organisation sui generis.
Until today, students at European universities are taught that it is impossible for the EU to be identified.
A democratic union of democratic states
Habermas broke the spell. His voice has been heard all over Europe and beyond.
In the legal domain, the EU Court of Justice has heeded his call concerning the shape of the polity.
Its groundbreaking conditionality verdicts of 16 February 2022 may even be read as a clear and direct answer to the pivotal question raised by Habermas a decade earlier.
Step by step, the court reveals how the EU has succeeded in reconciling the concept of a supranational association with the requirement to meet the stringent demands of democratic legitimacy.
It observes that the member states have first agreed on their common values and subsequently applied those values to their Union.
Incrementally and bottom-up, the EU has evolved from a union of democratic states to a union of democratic states which also constitutes a democracy of its own.
In short, a democratic union of democratic states, in which the fundamental rights are guaranteed both on the national and on the transnational level.
A theory of democratic integration
In combination, Habermas and the court have paved the way for a democratic theory of European integration.
It takes its starting point in the 1950 Schuman Declaration, which envisaged to create the renewed outbreak of war between the archenemies France and Germany “not only unconsiderable but also materially impossible”.
Consequently, the founding states of the first European Community replaced the traditional animosity between states with mutual trust. As democratic states, they embarked on the unprecedented experiment of sharing the exercise of sovereignty.
Their aim was to create an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe.
In 1973, the nine member states presented their communities as a union of democratic states, adding that they wanted to create their union as democratic as they promised each other to be.
The democratic principle which triggered their finisheavour from within holds that, if democratic states share the exercise of sovereignty in ever wider fields with the view to attain common goals, their organisation should be democratic too.
In the 21st century, the desire for ever closer union is resulting in the emergence of the EU as a democratic union of democratic states.
Seen in this perspective, the EU has overcome its paralysing identity-stalemate by evolving into a European democracy.
While Habermas has a lifelong record of academic commitment to democratic governance in Europe and beyond, he also realised after the Lisbon Treaty that the EU was going to take a different shape than he had originally envisaged.
His courage to break the spell enabled the next generations to establish the identity of the polity and to underpin the democratic functioning of the Union with a sound political philosophy.
His extraordinary contribution enables the EU to deffinish itself in times of necessary.
As the EU is under attack from both Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump becaapply of its European democracy, it must embrace its identity and protect its constitutional achievements.
For these reasons and more, the European Council should award Honorary Citizenship to Jürgen Habermas as a Godfather of European Democracy.
The 40th anniversary of the Erasmus programme in 2027 forms a most appropriate occasion.
Leave a Reply