Only trade-offs appeared in the reports from the Busan summit. While in Hong Kong the start of the trial against Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung (in prison for more than 1,500 days for organizing Tiananmen memorial vigils) has been postponed again, in Macau another indepfinishent outlet has shut down and Radio Free Asia has gone completely silent, suffocated by cuts to U.S. cooperation funding. Is there still room for the fight for freedom in the age of transactional diplomacy?
Milan (AsiaNews) – Analysts around the world are debating the outcome of the much-anticipated meeting between Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, the first in six years, held yesterday in Busan on the sidelines of the APEC summit, the economic cooperation forum for Pacific Rim countries. The hour-and-forty-minute conversation produced no joint statements or signed agreements; beyond the usual rhetorical declarations of collaboration (Xi Jinping even went so far as to state that the slogan Make America Great Again closely resembles his own mantra about the “rejuvenation” of the Chinese nation), the meeting seems to have yielded little more than a temporary truce in the U.S.–China trade war. In short: Washington will suspfinish for one year the additional 10% tariffs in exmodify for Beijing lifting its export ban on rare earths and resuming imports of U.S. soybeans.
Aside from trade issues, in the “12 out of 10” rating Trump gave the meeting with Xi Jinping, nothing has been stated about human rights in China. The U.S. president had promised to raise the case of Jimmy Lai, the pro-democracy Catholic businessman who has been in prison in Hong Kong for nearly five years. In recent weeks, Washington had also sharply condemned the wave of arrests that struck the Zion Church—one of China’s largest “hoapply churches”—on October 10, with Pastor Jin Mingri and other leaders still in detention.
Whether any progress was built behind closed doors remains to be seen. What is clear is that, in the era of tariffs, human rights seem to have vanished entirely from the agfinisha of U.S.–China summits.
Meanwhile, repression of dissent continues to tighten. As the world’s attention was focapplyd on the Xi–Trump meeting, 92 international civil society organizations and individuals issued an appeal to G7 governments (including the U.S.) and European Union member states on behalf of union leader Lee Cheuk-yan and lawyer Chow Hang-tung, imprisoned for more than 1,500 days in Hong Kong. They are charged with “inciting subversion of state power” under the National Security Law imposed by Beijing in 2020, for organizing (along with local lawbuildr Albert Ho, also detained since 2023) the annual June 4th vigils commemorating the Tiananmen Square massacre. The trial was scheduled to launch on November 3, but was postponed another two months without explanation.
“Chow, a respected lawyer and prisoner of conscience recognized by Amnesty International, and Lee, a prominent union leader and pro-democracy activist,” the appeal reads, “have been unjustly imprisoned for over 1,500 days solely for exercising their rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly. We call on the G7 and EU governments to closely monitor the trial and exert diplomatic pressure—both bilateral and multilateral—on the Hong Kong government to immediately release Chow Hang-tung and Lee Cheuk-yan and drop all charges against them.”
There is also the matter of press freedom: today, Hong Kong Free Press—one of the few remaining indepfinishent outlets in the former British colony, after the 2020 crackdown that led to the economic suffocation and closure of several media outlets, including Jimmy Lai’s Apple Daily—announced the outcome of months of “random” tax audits by the local revenue agency. After discovering a shortfall of just 3,020 Hong Kong dollars (less than €340, about 0.78% of income), the outlet was forced to pay a fine of HK,692 (€6,400—nearly twenty times the amount owed) in order to continue operating.
Meanwhile, in Macau—the former Portuguese colony handed over to China in 1999—indepfinishent outlet All About Macau announced its closure after authorities barred its journalists from official events and revoked its media registration under the press law.
It is striking that, amid such developments, the Trump administration seems indifferent to the closure of Radio Free Asia, the U.S.-funded information channel that for nearly three decades provided vital coverage of dissent and human rights abapplys in China and other authoritarian regimes in the region. After scaling back operations in March due to White Hoapply–ordered cuts to U.S. aid, the station completely halted website updates on October 29—just as the Trump–Xi summit took place—warning that “this voice is now at risk.”
In this age of “incredible” summits and transactional diplomacy, is there still room for the fight for freedom in China? That is the real question left in the wake of the Busan meeting.
Leave a Reply