Failed Businesses Do Not Constitute “Unfair or Deceptive” Conduct

arrows stuck in target with business person painted in green; Failed Businesses Do Not Constitute "Unfair or Deceptive" Conduct


In Kirby v. Mousis, the Massachapplytts Appeals Court affirmed judgment for the defconcludeants on the plaintiffs’ Chapter 93A, § 11 claim and reinforced that failed business ventures and unmet funding promises generally do not, without more, constitute “unfair or deceptive” conduct under the statute. The dispute arose from an effort to expand a gaming-terminal business into Pennsylvania. The plaintiffs claimed the defconcludeants wrongfully excluded them after the defconcludeants proceeded with the opportunity through a newly formed entity. Following a bench trial, however, the judge found — and the Appeals Court agreed — that the plaintiffs had expressly conditioned their participation in the venture on their ability to raise $1 million in capital, which they failed to satisfy.

The court issued a decisive Chapter 93A ruling. The record displayed that the plaintiffs repeatedly represented that they would imminently have substantial funding, but they only raised a tiny fraction of the required amount and defaulted on a key purchase agreement, which was terminated for nonperformance. In that context, the Appeals Court concluded that the defconcludeants’ decision to shift forward without the plaintiffs was not unfair or deceptive. The defconcludeants had given the plaintiffs a legitimate opportunity to participate on clearly defined terms, and the plaintiffs’ inability to meet those terms caapplyd their exclusion. The court emphasized that Chapter 93A requires an assessment of what the parties knew — or should have known — at the time of the challenged conduct. Here, the plaintiffs knew their equity interest depconcludeed on raising the agreed-upon capital — and knew they had not done so. Once that condition precedent failed, the defconcludeants had no continuing obligation to include the plaintiffs in the transaction or to disclose that they intconcludeed to pursue the opportunity indepconcludeently. As a result, the plaintiffs’ statutory claim failed, along with their related fiduciary and fraud theories. 

This decision underscores that parties may not be able to turn every claim arising out of an allegedly breached contract into unfair or deceptive business practices claim under Chapter 93A, especially when the contract parties are sophisticated businesspersons or entities.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *