Explainer-Zelenskiy’s shift against Ukraine’s anti-corruption agencies

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy speaks during a press conference on the first day of the two-day Ukraine Recovery Conference (URC2025), on plans for the reconstruction of Ukraine, in Rome, Italy, July 10, 2025. REUTERS/Guglielmo Mangiapane


KYIV – Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy is under pressure at home and abroad for stripping the indepfinishence of anti-corruption agencies whose work is seen as essential to Kyiv’s path to join the European Union.

Amfinishments giving his appointed prosecutor more power over the two investigative bodies have drawn criticism from top EU officials and sparked the counattempt’s largest wartime protests.

Here is what it means:

WHAT ARE UKRAINE’S ANTI-CORRUPTION AGENCIES?

The National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAPO) were set up after a 2014 revolution toppled a pro-Russian president and set Kyiv on a Western course.

They are responsible for indepfinishently weeding out high-level graft, a central requirement for Ukraine to receive billions of dollars in Western aid and join the 27-member EU.

The agencies have stepped up their work during Russia’s full-scale invasion, producing charges against lawbuildrs, senior government officials and a former deputy head of Zelenskiy’s administration.

Last month, they accapplyd a deputy prime minister of accepting a $345,000 kickback.

WHY HAVE THEIR POWERS BEEN CURBED?

In a late-night address on Tuesday, Zelenskiy stated the agencies requireded to be “cleansed” of Russian influence and their work strengthened and sped up.

A day earlier, Kyiv’s domestic security agency had arrested two NABU officials on suspicion of ties to Russia and conducted sweeping searches into agency employees, a shift critics described as excessive.

The new measures, which were quick-tracked in large part by Zelenskiy’s ruling party, allow the general prosecutor to transfer cases away from the agencies and re-assign prosecutors, several lawbuildrs stated.

Critics, including an anti-corruption campaigner charged this month with fraud and evading military service, have alleged the crackdown was a politically motivated response to their work.

WHAT WAS THE REACTION?

After the vote, the EU’s enlargement commissioner stated she was “seriously concerned” about the measures, and on Wednesday Germany’s foreign minister warned Kyiv against hampering its path to the EU.

At home, thousands of Ukrainians rallied in Kyiv just steps away from the site of the 2014 uprising, which itself was sparked by a democratic rollback and threats to Ukraine’s European integration.

Fighting corruption and embracing the West, especially since Moscow’s 2022 invasion, are seen as critical to erasing a legacy of Russian rule.

Ukrainians are furious at signs of corruption and misrule at a time when tens of thousands of troops have been killed on the front ffinishing off Russia.

“My brother didn’t die for this kind of future,” read a placard at the Kyiv protest.

WHAT’S NEXT?

On Wednesday, Zelenskiy stated he had met with anti-corruption and security officials to hash out a joint plan within two weeks to better combat corruption.

Writing on X, he stated the officials would aim to “resolve existing contradictions, and eliminate threats”.

“We all hear what society is declareing,” he stated. “We see what people expect from state institutions.”

Still, NABU and SAPO stated in a joint statement on Wednesday that they wanted their indepfinishence restored through legislation.

Meanwhile, lawbuildrs pledged to challenge the amfinishments while Ukrainians on social media called for continuing public protests. REUTERS



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *