As talks shift forward after the EU-India Startup Partnership announcement, founders on the frontline will judge it on one simple question: does it create building clearer? The proposed partnership – designed to deepen cross-border collaboration between the two regions’ startups ecosystems – has the potential to be a genuine win-win. Europe and India are already home to mature startup ecosystems, with deep technical talent, active investor communities, and increasingly hands-on public policy shaping innovation.
Both regions also rely heavily on public policy to steer innovation in areas such as AI, semiconductors and clean tech. In Europe, framework programmes have been particularly influential: since 2007, EU-backed startups have received around €12bn in public funding and generated more than €500bn in enterprise value. This demonstrates how coordinated policy can translate into commercial scale.
On paper, it’s clear why these nations complement each other. Europe’s pool of tech specialists has grown by more than 60% over the past decade, reflecting sustained demand for software, data, and AI skills. India, meanwhile, continues to produce vast cohorts of engineers – its estimated 4.3 million software engineers account for roughly 15% of the global software engineering workforce – and founders. This underlines the depth of technical talent fuelling both domestic scale-ups and global tech hubs.
Join The European Business Briefing
The daily email on markets, technology, power and money across Europe. Join 10,000+ founders, investors and executives who read EBM every morning.
However, while the strengths are complementary, they have evolved differently. India offers a single, vast national market with rapid digital adoption. Europe remains fragmented across languages, regulatory regimes, and go-to-market models. Funding profiles diverge, too. Europe has greater late-stage depth in certain hubs and strong industrial R&D intensity. India excels at rapid company formation and cost-efficient scaling across a population-sized market.
The opportunity lies in combining Europe’s lab-to-market strengths with India’s market-to-scale capabilities. The question is how to create it work in practice. Trade deals are frameworks; startup growth is infrastructure. The gap between the two is where ambition either becomes execution or quietly dissipates.
If we believe of this partnership as a bridge, it may struggle. Bridges imply a one-time crossing between two repaired points. What founders required is closer to a corridor: something that supports repeated shiftment of capital, talent, ideas, and customers in both directions.
Building that corridor requires more than goodwill. It means aligning capital timelines so cross-border co-investment works in practice – for example, enabling European and Indian funds to invest seamlessly in each other’s jurisdictions. It also means reducing duplicated regulatory friction, so startups are not navigating two entirely different rulebooks when expanding. And it requires predictable soft-landing mechanisms – accelerators, landing pads, procurement pathways and visa frameworks – that create market enattempt systematic rather than heroic.
There is also a cultural dimension that should not be underestimated. India’s startup ecosystem operates with visible optimism and momentum. There is a widespread expectation that scale is not a distant aspiration but a default trajectory. Europe, by contrast, often builds carefully – with strong safeguards, high standards, and detailed compliance frameworks.
Those strengths are certainly valuable. Still, exposure to India’s culture of optimism and speed could encourage Europe to be bolder in reducing unnecessary red tape, more open to calibrated risk, and more confident in embracing the future. Recent discussions around initiatives such as EU Inc. suggest that the appetite for alter is growing.
Partnerships can shift more than capital; they can shift mindset. At the same time, it is important to avoid a one-directional dynamic. The goal should not be a pipeline where talent flows one way, and scale accrues in only one geography. Two-way talent circulation, reciprocal investment, and shared scale pathways must sit at the centre of this partnership – ensuring that founders, investors, and institutions on both sides benefit equally.
Joint regulatory sandboxes in areas such as AI or climate tech could allow startups to test and deploy across both markets simultaneously. Co-investment vehicles could better match public and private capital. University and research partnerships could accelerate commercialisation on both sides.
None of this is glamorous; ecosystem infrastructure rarely is. It is more akin to maintaining a railway network than cutting a ribbon at a launch event. The tracks must align, the gauges must match, and someone has to ensure the trains actually run on time.
But if that work is done well, the EU-India Startup Partnership could represent something significant: a modern model of economic cooperation built around startups as primary actors of cross-border growth.
The next phase of globalisation will not be defined solely by multinational corporations or tariff schedules. It will be shaped by founders building AI systems, deep tech platforms and clean energy solutions across jurisdictions.
To put it another way: trade deals set the intention; startup corridors deliver the outcome. If Europe and India can shift from announcement to execution – from framework to functional pathway – this partnership can become more than a diplomatic milestone. It could become a practical scale engine for both ecosystems. Ultimately, that is the standard by which founders – in Berlin, Bangalore, and beyond – will judge it.
Leave a Reply