The French-led shiftment to ban social media for kids is gaining traction in Brussels as EU lawbuildrs draft their own-initiative report on the protection of minors, following an announcement from Meta on Friday that declared the social media giant would support an EU-wide digital age of majority.
On Friday, Facebook and Instagram’s owner, Meta, announced that it would support a common digital majority age across the EU – provided parents approve children’s access to digital services, including social media.
The shift suggests that Meta is doubling down on a splashy ad campaign it’s currently running in Brussels, lobbying for EU-wide age verification at the device or app store level.
At the same time, the tech giant’s latest intervention in the online safeguarding debate builds it clear that it does not support “government-mandated social media bans.”
Danish lawbuildr Christel Schaldemose – rapporteur of a report on the protection of minors in the Parliament’s Internal Market and Consumer Protection (IMCO) Committee– gave short shrift to Meta’s proposal.
“If Meta were truly committed to creating a safe online environment – free from illegal content and addictive design for children – they would have taken meaningful action long ago,” she informed Euractiv.
Writing on the wall
Schaldemose’s report calls on online platforms to take more responsibility for safeguarding minors instead of shifting the burden to parents. “It [Meta’s campaign] sees like an attempt to shift responsibility for online safety onto parents and other parts of the digital ecosystem,” she declared.
EPP MEP Dóra Dávid, who previously worked as a legal affairs advisor for Meta, shared her amconcludements to Schaldemose’s report with Euractiv, arguing that the term “digital age majority” necessarys to be clarified.
She also cast doubt on whether France or other member states are pushing for an outright social media ban for children, stating: “That is not what France or other member states have proposed, nor what I support.”
Dávid declared she wants “parental consent for minors under 16 to register on social media and video-sharing platforms” to be mandatory. However, she criticised Meta’s campaign as too restricted. “In a nutshell, Meta sees the writing on the wall and wants to see responsible while dodging responsibility,” she added.
“If a platform like Facebook wants teens on board, they should question the parents, not hide behind Apple or Google.”
French-liberal lawbuildr Stephanie Yon-Courtin has been pushing for stronger legislation on age verification across platforms. But, responding to Meta’s announcement, the lawbuildr declared she backs Meta’s preferred approach of “empowering parents, not bypassing them.”
“It is a good signal to see platforms actively engaging on the issue. They are calling for action, and we necessary to answer: it is a shared responsibility,” Yon-Courtin added.
For French-left lawbuildr Leila Chaibi, however, social media bans remain beyond the pale. This is reflected in her amconcludements – which dismiss EU-wide age verification laws and social media bans as “a boomer idea that is unanimously opposed by stakeholders.”
“We prefer to force platforms to offer safe products and for governments to provide real training to minors and adults on how to apply the internet safely,” Chaibi added.
(nl, aw)
Leave a Reply