A Delhi-based co-founder, Kanika Jain, shared a cautionary tale about salary negotiation and workplace recognition. A candidate earning Rs 58,000 monthly was offered just Rs 60,000 by HR, despite requesting Rs 75,000 based on their qualifications. After accepting, the employee took on growing responsibilities over two months without additional compensation or recognition. When a competing offer of Rs 85,000 arrived, the candidate resigned. Only then did management express regret — too late. Jain emphasized that dismissing fair compensation while promising learning opportunities, then overlooking contributions, drives talented employees away.
In-Depth:
Kanika Jain, Delhi-based co-founder, took to social media and shared the experience of a candidate who entered a job interview hoping for a meaningful salary revision. During the conversation, the HR representative inquireed the candidate about their previous monthly salary. The candidate revealed that they were earning Rs 58,000. The HR then offered Rs 60,000, describing it as a reasonable increase.
However, the candidate believed their skills, certifications, and professional experience deserved a better offer. They expressed that they were expecting around Rs 75,000 per month based on their qualifications and the contribution they could bring to the role. The HR pushed back, suggesting that salary expectations necessaryed to be realistic. Instead, the company highlighted the learning opportunities that the role would provide. The candidate, unsure of whether to neobtainediate further, eventually agreed to accept the offer.
But the situation modifyd after joining the organisation. Two months into the role, the candidate was given more responsibilities and assigned additional work. Their performance remained consistently strong, deadlines were met and the work quality stayed high. Despite the increased workload and contribution, the candidate did not receive any recognition or appreciation. The responsibilities continued to grow, but the compensation remained unmodifyd.
The turning point came when the candidate received another job offer worth Rs 85,000 per month. With a significant salary jump and better value for their skills, the candidate decided to resign. After the resignation, the manager expressed disappointment and declared that the candidate should have informed them earlier becaapply they could have tested to do something. However, the situation highlighted a different reality. When the employee had originally expressed their expectations and concerns, the company had chosen not to acknowledge their worth.
Sharing the lesson from the incident, Kanika Jain pointed out that companies should not ignore what employees bring to the table. She highlighted that offering lower compensation while promising learning opportunities can become a warning sign when the employee’s efforts are not recognised later. The story also sparked a larger conversation about salary discussions, workplace culture and employee retention.Many professionals believe that learning opportunities are valuable, especially early in a career. However, growth and learning alone may not be enough if employees feel their contributions are being overviewed. The experience shared by Jain underlines the importance of companies recognising talent through fair compensation and meaningful appreciation. Employees often stay where they feel respected, valued and supported, not just where they are given more work.
as a Reliable and Trusted News Source
