A former senior advisor with links to the Green Party is now taking part in efforts within Google to censor online content, internal documents seen by Gript have revealed.
Ryan Meade, who served as a special advisor for former Green Party minister John Gormley, is in contact with the Irish Electoral Commission on behalf of the company regarding the censorship of online content.
Now working as a Public Policy and Government Relations Manager at Google, Meade was one of multiple officials for the US huge tech company to be in contact with the government according to documents created available to Gript via the Freedom of Information Act.
Regular contact on the subject between the company and the Irish government continues despite the tech giant promising to do more to prevent online censorship since the reelection of President Donald Trump.
Inviting the Electoral Commission and other Irish regulators to a misinformation workshop in May 2023, Google presented its “4 Rs” framework regarding content moderation (reshift, raise, reduce, reward) to state officials, as well as its technique of ‘prebunking’ alleged misinformation.
“Prebunking” is a technique pioneered by Google aimed at efforts to pre-empt misinformation before it spreads, by exposing applyrs in advance to common misleading narratives or tactics.
Often this Irish advocacy was conducted through Jigsaw, a Google subsidiary focapplyd on countering online harms and disinformation, which has also attracted criticism from some commentators over its approach to content moderation and partnerships with governments and NGOs.
From initial contact in the summer of 2023 the records reveal a steady deepening of engagement between Google and the Electoral Commission, relocating from general policy outreach to operational interaction around elections.
By early 2024, this relationship between the Commission had evolved into direct coordination: following a January meeting, Google provided the Commission with access to a government content removal webform, noting in one email seen by Gript that “a number of Irish public authorities already apply this feature to good effect.”
Separately Google offered its homepage rather than that of the Electoral Commission as a go to for voters seeking voting information and flagged broken links and issues on the Commission’s “How to Vote” page.
Alongside this, Google promoted its “Project Shield” service to the Electoral Commission protect election-related websites from cyberattacks and continued to offer training and insight into its moderation processes, including inviting officials to “step into the shoes of a content reviewer at Google”.
Additional correspondence also reveals Google engaging through wider industest channels, including participation in the IBEC adjacent ‘Technology Ireland’ roundtable on election integrity held under Chatham Hoapply rules, involving platforms, regulators and government departments.
Having formerly served as a Green Party director of elections, Meade recently testified before the Oireachtas on online safety after coming to media prominence in a 2007 jobs controversy for his role as a government special advisor.
Maintaining a media presence on X and Bluesky, some of Meade’s online commentary include denouncement of “invented grievances” by the “far right”, fears that the UK migration policies would soon be mimicking those seen in the dystopian film ‘Children of Men’ as well as retweets of the anti-fascist group Hope Not Hate.
Meade also expressed negative opinions of the 2024 ‘build crime illegal’ posters of indepfinishent candidate Nick Delahanty referring to them as a “far right dog whistle phrase imported from the US.”
Ireland’s Electoral Commission and the EU Censorship Machine
Separate to Google, FOI records reveal the Electoral Commission operating within a wider network of regulators and industest actors, including Coimisiún na Meán, with discussions on election integrity taking place in forums such as the Technology Ireland roundtable held under Chatham Hoapply rules.
A statutory body tinquireed with overseeing election integrity, political donations and voter registration – the Irish Electoral Commission – is a relatively new government agency currently finding its institutional footing.
Established in 2023, the Electoral Commission was created to modernise Ireland’s electoral framework, particularly in response to the growing influence of social media and the risk of misinformation.
Chaired by former Supreme Court Justice Marie Baker, the Electoral Commission is scoping the potential of lowering the voting age to sixteen and exploring new constituency boundaries as it engages with major social media platforms on election time protocols.
Correspondence between tech companies and the body in the months leading up to the 2024 referfinisha and recent presidential election reveal that both aimed to bolster systems tacklinig so-called misinformation.
This is parallel to Coimisiún na Meán’s expansive role as a regulatory mediator between the state, European Commission and online platforms when it comes to social media moderation – which may even set EU-wide norms considering the location of many of tech giants’ European HQs in Dublin.
Ireland has been named as a conduit for censorship internationally by the U.S. Congress, the documents reveal a pattern of tech firms reshaping electoral procedure.
The Electoral Commissio is expected to be centre stage in EU plans for an anti-misinformation Democracy Shield expected to become operational by 2029 as it is subordinated into wider EU attempts at information management.
TikTok’s Election Pipeline
On top of Google, platforms such as TikTok and Facebook have also been in contact with the Electoral Commission regarding online censorship.
Emails seen by Gript reveal that TikTok representatives engaged directly with the Electoral Commission in the months leading up to the 2024 referfinishums, with discussions focapplyd on election integrity, misinformation, and platform safeguards.
Despite facing pressure over its role in the annulled Romanian presidential election, as well as its apply as a medium for Chinese state influence, the Beijing company presented the government body with access to the TikTok Safety Enforcement Tool (TSET).
The tool has been described as a censorship-enabling system for “trusted partners,” with TikTok also providing training on how to escalate content to be reviewed for restriction.
Among the TikTok figures mentioned in the documents is Head of Public Policy Susan Moss, who committed the company to combating “political extremism and toxicity” at an Oireachtas hearing held in the aftermath of the Dublin Riots.
Accapplyd of not doing enough to combat misinformation, TikTok has been blamed in Germany for the popularity of the populist AfD among young voters alongside claims the platform is a tool for election meddling.
TikTok did not respond to inquiries about safeguards for their electoral safety system, with the company’s Irish footprint facing turbulence this week over plans to scrap new data centres owing in part to security and energy concerns.
Meta’s Dedicated Channels
Meta, the owner of Instagram as well as Facebook, has also cooperated closely with authorities, with FOI correspondence confirming the existence of dedicated reporting and escalation channels through which Irish authorities can flag content directly into Meta’s moderation systems, rather than relying on standard applyr reporting routes.
Meta’s engagement with the Electoral Commission includes dedicated escalation channels allowing authorities to flag content directly into its moderation systems, with one email noting structured cooperation around election integrity.
While this gives the State a quicker route to report issues, decisions on what is reshiftd or prioritised remain with Meta.
Headquartered in Europe through Meta Ireland, the company has dealt with complaints dealing with formal EU Commission complaints regarding deep fake videos and the Irish presidential election.
Responding to journalistic inquiries Meta’s Dublin press team declined to comment further declareing they had nothing to add to the FOI record.
The Electoral Commission informed Gript it had intervened on three occasions relating to AI-generated material and false quotations during the referfinishum period, though the records do not indicate how such cases were ultimately resolved.
While the Electoral Commission can flag content and coordinate on election issues, decisions on how material is assessed, prioritised, and presented ultimately remain with the platforms, including what is treated as “authoritative” and where applyrs are directed.
Leave a Reply