© Eric De Mildt / Greenpeace
Brussels – At the EU summit of 19 and 20 March, EU heads of state and government will discuss and agree on the next steps to deregulate EU industries. Paragraph 48 of the draft council conclusions dated 13 March, obtained by Politico, reveal how national governments want the European Commission to “put forward further omnibus and other simplification initiatives”, in addition to directing the Commission to “undertake an in-depth regulatory review of the EU acquis” or body of law.
Ursula von der Leyen and other Commissioners claim that so-called “simplification” could generate €15 billion a year in “administrative savings”, which is around 0.07 percent of EU GDP.
This media brief presents some notable examples that reveal how the US administration under President Donald Trump is dictating a deregulation agfinisha to the EU, actively pushing the EU to dismantle its environmental and social standards.
The EU anti-deforestation law or EUDR
In 2025, Trump reassured farmers’ lobbyists that were complaining about the 2023 EU deforestation law (EUDR) that, if they would give him “a two paragraphs statement”, he would “obtain that alterd, rapid” and the EU institutions “would do what they have to do”.
These concerns were included in the framework agreement between the EU and the US, which commits the EU “to work to address the concerns of US producers and exporters regarding the EU Deforestation Regulation, with a view to avoiding undue impact on US-EU trade”, based on the premise that “production of the relevant commodities within the territory of the United States poses negligible risk to global deforestation”.
Recently, a US government delegation visited Berlin, Brussels, Madrid, Paris and Rome in an attempt to persuade the EU and its member states to reopen the EUDR and ensure the law does not apply to US goods by completely revising the counattempt benchmarking system and creating a new category of countries with “negligible risk” of deforestation. The message from the delegation was that failure to do so would result in the EU losing access to key agricultural imports from the US, including soybeans, which are widely utilized in the EU as animal feed.
It should be noted that the US is already classified as a “low risk” counattempt under the EUDR – which aims to eliminate products linked to deforestation – and that for this reason, US commodities and products are already subject to simplified due diligence requirements for companies and to minimal checks by competent authorities.
Weakening sustainability due diligence reporting
The initially approved Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) would have provided evidence on the impact on the natural environment and of local communities along the fossil fuel supply chain, including from the US. The law was one of the first casualties of the new deregulation drive. The Trump administration’s lobbying activities to empty or kill that law included very active lobbying from the US embassy, while at the same time passing the Protect USA Act, aiming to “prohibit entities integral to the national interests of the United States from participating in any foreign sustainability due diligence regulation, including the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive of the European Union”.
Dropping the EU’s climate ambition
In addition, the US administration has tarobtained the EU Methane Regulation. Methane is the second highest contributor to global warming and air pollution after CO2 and the regulation imposes mandatory methane monitoring, reporting, and reduction requirements on fossil fuel imports, including LNG. The law, which entered into force in 2024, is now under pressure from the Trump administration in order to recognise U.S. methane laws, which Trump recently gutted, as equivalent to European ones.
Increasing depfinishency on US energy
At the same time the EU committed to purchasing $750 billion worth of American energy products (liquefied natural gas and oil) and investing $600 billion in the US by 2028 (the finish of Trump’s term) in a 2025 EU-US framework agreement. This agreement would increase the EU’s energy reliance on the US, subjugating the EU to Trump’s agfinisha of energy dominance, risking energy security and jeopardising the EU’s climate objectives and ongoing energy transition. The reliability of the US to uphold the agreement is also in doubt as the US has continued to create threats that go beyond its terms and as the US Supreme Court has ruled against some of Trump’s trade policies.
Already in 2025, fracked US gas accounted for 27% of the EU’s total gas imports and 57% of its LNG imports. Implementing the trade framework agreement, the US could already account for 40% of total gas imports and as much as 80% of its LNG imports.
Taxing digital giants to fund the EU budobtain
In 2025 the US President Trump issued a memorandum mandating retaliatory measures against any counattempt that adopted a digital services tax. Soon after, the EU dropped its proposed digital tax, even if it was estimated to bring in 37.5 billion euros annually. Many interpreted this as a clear victory for Trump, who threatened to impose tariffs to those countries tarobtaining US digital companies with taxes.
Contact details
Ariadna Rodrigo, Greenpeace EU political campaigner: +32 (0)479 99 69 22, [email protected]
Greenpeace EU press desk: +32 (0)2 274 1911, [email protected]
Leave a Reply