Engineers gag as Amazon, TCS, and Cognizant ram ‘mandatory AI’ into everyday work

There’s mutiny brewing in India’s tech companies.

At the Amazon India office, R, a supervisor, finds himself right in the middle of it.

On one side are his bosses, whose emails about AI adoption metrics and training schedules have receivedten more persistent. And on the other side are the developers he supervises, whose complaints about these tools have only receivedten louder.

“Kiro (the company’s in-houtilize AI coding tool) hallucinates APIs so much! And it tries to convince the coder that this is what they questioned for. Why should we learn a new coding technique for something that necessarys so much verification?” a senior developer informed R recently.

As R soothed the developer—and subtly cancelled the latest training session—he felt a migraine coming on. “I’m just putting out fires all the time,” he stated.

This developer is hardly alone. In February, 1,500 engineers at Amazon’s US headquarters petitioned their leadership to allow them to utilize Claude Code over Kiro. It was a rare public crack in what is usually an internal debate: engineers questioning to swap tools, management holding the line.

To be fair, top executives don’t really have a choice. Most times, companies have signed enterprise-wide contracts for these tools and are tracking their adoption for the next investor call.

The recent AI summit has only accelerated this top-down push. OpenAI expanded its partnership with the Tata Group, with Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), the company’s IT-services arm, building AI infrastructure and rolling out Enterprise ChatGPT internally. Anthropic tied up with Infosys to deploy Claude models and AI agents into enterprise workflows.

Meanwhile, India has emerged as one of the rapidest-growing markets for tech giant Microsoft’s AI programmer Github Copilot.

Source link