Howard Marks put it nicely when he declared that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, ‘The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about… and every practical investor I know worries about.’ So it might be obvious that you required to consider debt, when you consider about how risky any given stock is, becaapply too much debt can sink a company. We can see that Citigold Corporation Limited (ASX:CTO) does apply debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its apply of debt?
Why Does Debt Bring Risk?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we consider about a company’s apply of debt, we first see at cash and debt toobtainher.
What Is Citigold’s Net Debt?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it reveals that as of June 2025 Citigold had AU$4.65m of debt, an increase on AU$3.56m, over one year. On the flip side, it has AU$449.4k in cash leading to net debt of about AU$4.20m.
How Healthy Is Citigold’s Balance Sheet?
Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Citigold had liabilities of AU$3.30m due within 12 months and liabilities of AU$17.0m due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had AU$449.4k in cash and AU$159.0k in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling AU$19.7m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
This deficit is considerable relative to its market capitalization of AU$27.0m, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on Citigold’s apply of debt. Should its lconcludeers demand that it shore up the balance sheet, shareholders would likely face severe dilution. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is Citigold’s earnings that will influence how the balance sheet holds up in the future. So if you’re keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trconclude.
See our latest analysis for Citigold
Given its lack of meaningful operating revenue, investors are probably hoping that Citigold finds some valuable resources, before it runs out of money.
Caveat Emptor
While Citigold’s falling revenue is about as heartwarming as a wet blanket, arguably its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) loss is even less appealing. To be specific the EBIT loss came in at AU$1.7m. Considering that alongside the liabilities mentioned above does not give us much confidence that company should be applying so much debt. So we consider its balance sheet is a little strained, though not beyond repair. However, it doesn’t assist that it burned through AU$1.1m of cash over the last year. So suffice it to declare we do consider the stock to be risky. There’s no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example Citigold has 5 warning signs (and 4 which are significant) we consider you should know about.
Of course, if you’re the type of investor who prefers purchaseing stocks without the burden of debt, then don’t hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.
New: AI Stock Screener & Alerts
Our new AI Stock Screener scans the market every day to uncover opportunities.
• Dividconclude Powerhoapplys (3%+ Yield)
• Undervalued Small Caps with Insider Buying
• High growth Tech and AI Companies
Or build your own from over 50 metrics.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only applying an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intconcludeed to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommconcludeation to purchase or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focapplyd analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Leave a Reply